Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832518›Full record

ReviewGenes & diseases2019

Gene fusions and chimeric RNAs, and their implications in cancer.

Hao Wu, Xiaorong Li, Hui Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Induction of ferroptosis in prostate cancer by CCDC7Cell death and differentiation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Calculating Relative Chimeric RNA Expression with FusionBlaster.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Evolution of Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Omics-based molecular classifications empowering in precision oncology.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Chimeric RNAiScience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Non-Canonical Splicing and Its Implications in Brain Physiology and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hao WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
Xiaorong LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene fusions are appreciated as ideal cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Chimeric RNAs are traditionally thought to be products of gene fusions, and thus, also cancer-specific. Recent research has demonstrated that chimeric RNAs can be generated by intergenic splicing in the absence of gene fusion, and such chimeric RNAs are also found in normal physiology. These new findings challenge the traditional theory of chimeric RNAs exclusivity to cancer, and complicates use of chimeric RNAs in cancer detection. Here, we provide an overview of gene fusions and chimeric RNAs, and emphasize their differences. We note that gene fusions are able to generate chimeric RNAs in accordance with the central dogma of biology, and that chimeric RNAs may also be able to influence the generation of the gene fusions per the "horse before the cart" hypothesis. We further expand upon the "horse before the cart" hypothesis, summarizing current evidence in support of the theory and exploring its potential impact on the field.

Indexed as

Chimeric RNAChromosomal rearrangementcis-splicing between adjacent genesGene fusionIntergenic splicingTrans-splicing

Identifiers

PMID31832518
PMCPMC6889028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.