Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832377›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2019

Lymphangiographic Interventions to Manage Postoperative Chylothorax.

Hyuncheol Jeong, Hyo Yeong Ahn, Hoon Kwon, Yeong Dae Kim, Jeong Su Cho, Jungseop Eom

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Corrigendum: Lymphangiographic Interventions to Manage Postoperative Chylothorax.The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyuncheol JeongDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University Medical Research Institution, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2556-0808
Hyo Yeong AhnDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University Medical Research Institution, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3198-8237
Hoon KwonDepartment of Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University Medical Research Institution, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4055-5863
Yeong Dae KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University Medical Research Institution, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7135-4648
Jeong Su ChoDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University Medical Research Institution, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7422-6171
Jungseop EomDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University Medical Research Institution, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0832-1314
Pusan National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative chylothorax may be caused by iatrogenic injury of the collateral lymphatic ducts after thoracic surgery. Although traditional treatment could be considered in most cases, resolution may be slow. Radiological interventions have recently been developed to manage postoperative chylothorax. This study aimed to compare radiological interventions and conservative management in patients with postoperative chylothorax.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed periprocedural drainage time, length of hospital stay, and nil per os (NPO) duration in 7 patients who received radiological interventions (intervention group [IG]) and in 9 patients who received conservative management (non-intervention group [NG]).

resultsThe baseline characteristics of the patients in the IG and NG were comparable; however, the median drainage time and median length of hospital stay after detection of chylothorax were significantly shorter in the IG than in the NG (6 vs. 10 days, p=0.036 and 10 vs. 20 days, p=0.025, respectively). NPO duration after chylothorax detection and total drainage duration were somewhat shorter in the IG than in the NG (5 vs. 7 days and 8 vs. 14 days, respectively).

conclusionThis study showed that radiological interventions reduced the duration of drainage and the length of hospital stay, allowing an earlier return to normal life. To overcome several limitations of this study, a prospective, randomized controlled trial with a larger number of patients is recommended.

Indexed as

ChylothoraxLymphographyPostoperative careThoracic ductThoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID31832377
PMCPMC6901187
OpenAlexW2993893462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.