Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832352›Full record

ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2019

The value of an "Endocarditis Team".

Piroze M Davierwala, Mateo Marin-Cuartas, Martin Misfeld, Michael A Borger

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Impact of a dedicated multidisciplinary committee (Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ACEF score and lactate: lifeline predictors in endocarditis valve procedures: insights from a single-center study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Outcomes after surgery for infective endocarditis.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024
    Review
  13. Infective endocarditis-whose baby? Everyone's!Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Perioperative Complications in Infective Endocarditis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piroze M DavierwalaUniversity Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Mateo Marin-CuartasUniversity Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Martin MisfeldUniversity Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael A BorgerUniversity Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig Heart Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishment of the Heart Team concept in the field of cardiovascular medicine has resulted in quality improvement in the management of heart valve disease and heart failure. Similarly, the concept of an Endocarditis Team would be important in improving outcomes in patients with infective endocarditis (IE), given it is an uncommon clinical entity with general practitioners and low-volume centers lacking sufficient experience in its management. A multidisciplinary approach can substantially reduce the still unacceptably high morbidity and mortality in patients with IE, as it allows early diagnosis and appropriate comprehensive management. Decision-making within the Endocarditis Team must follow a standard protocol that is based on current clinical guidelines for the management of IE. If surgery is indicated, it is best performed sooner than later in most instances. Communication between referring hospitals and reference centers with an established Endocarditis Team must be smooth and definite protocols for transfer to experienced endocarditis centers with surgical facilities is essential. Follow-up and outpatient care following hospital discharge is crucial due to the possibility of residual infection and risk of development of recurrent endocarditis or heart failure, particularly within the first 2 years. Patient and health-care provider education is the mainstay for the accurate implementation of the Endocarditis Team concept. The following Keynote Lecture offers an overview of the current literature supporting the multidisciplinary management of IE and addresses multiple aspects related to the Endocarditis Team, highlighting its importance and necessity for the comprehensive treatment of this complex disease.

Indexed as

Endocarditis Teamheart valve surgeryInfective endocarditis (IE)

Identifiers

PMID31832352
PMCPMC6892719
OpenAlexW2977638217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.