Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832341›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2020

A comparison of compensatory and restorative cognitive interventions in early psychosis.

Sean A Kidd, Yarissa Herman, Gursharan Virdee, Christopher R Bowie, Dawn Velligan, Christina Plagiannakos, Aristotle Voineskos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sean A KiddUniversity of Toronto Department of Psychiatry, Canada.
Yarissa HermanToronto Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, CAMH, 1001 Queen St. W., Toronto, Ontario M6J1H1, Canada.
Gursharan VirdeeToronto Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, CAMH, 1001 Queen St. W., Toronto, Ontario M6J1H1, Canada.
Christopher R BowieQueens University, Department of Psychology, 219 Craine Hall, Kingston K7L 3N6, Ontario, Canada.
Dawn VelliganUniversity of Texas at San Antonio, Department of Psychiatry, 7526 Louis Pasteur Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Christina PlagiannakosToronto Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Canada.
Aristotle VoineskosUniversity of Toronto Department of Psychiatry, CAMH, 250 College St., Toronto M5T1R8, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This randomized trial examined the relative effectiveness of primarily compensatory and primarily restorative cognitive interventions in an early psychosis population. A total of 56 patients were randomized to one of two treatments which were applied for four months with a five month follow up assessment. Comparisons were between (1) Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) - a treatment that uses environmental supports and weekly home visits to compensate for cognitive challenges and improve community functioning and (2) Action Based Cognitive Remediation (ABCR) - a treatment involving computerized cognitive drill and practice exercises, simulations, goal setting, and behavioral activation. Linear mixed effects models demonstrated significant effects on community functioning for both CAT and ABCR without a difference between conditions (n = 39), with an indication of greater gains at follow up in the ABCR group (n = 31). Improvements in symptomatology were less robust with mixed findings across neurocognition metrics. This study concluded that both CAT and ABCR hold promise as interventions for early intervention psychosis populations but more work is needed to identify illness severity, subtype and contextual considerations that might indicate an emphasis on more compensatory versus more restorative cognitive interventions.

Indexed as

Cognitive adaptation trainingCognitive remediationPsychosisRandomized trialSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID31832341
PMCPMC6889589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.