Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832244›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2019

Using simulation to explore the impact of device design on the learning and performance of peripheral intravenous cannulation.

Bronwyn Reid-McDermott, Maryanne Browne, Dara Byrne, Paul O'Connor, Emily O'Dowd, Chloe Walsh, Caoimhe Madden, Sinéad Lydon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bronwyn Reid-McDermott1Irish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Maryanne Browne2School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Dara Byrne1Irish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Paul O'Connor1Irish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Emily O'Dowd1Irish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Chloe Walsh1Irish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Caoimhe Madden1Irish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Sinéad Lydon1Irish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5700-4350
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe design of medical devices impacts upon the performance of healthcare professionals and patient safety. However, multiple devices serving the same function are often available. The purpose of this study was to use simulation as a means of examining the impact of differences in device design on (1) learning of, or attainment of behavioral fluency in, peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC); and (2) the generalization, or transfer, of learning on one device to performance of PIVC using an untrained device.

methodsA total of 25 final cycle medical students participated in this study which used a randomized two-group design. Participants were randomly assigned to learn PIVC using either a closed PIVC device (a single device which consists of an intravenous cannula with a pre-attached extension tube;

resultsAll participants in both groups met the fluency criterion, and no significant differences were observed in the number of trials or total training required by groups to achieve fluency. Participants in both groups improved significantly from baseline (

conclusionsParticipants achieved fluency in PIVC regardless of the device used. However, significant decrements in performance were observed when participants were required to perform PIVC using a novel device. This finding supports the need for careful consideration of devices purchased and supplied in the clinical setting, and the need for training prior to the introduction of novel devices or for new staff members.

Indexed as

Behavioral fluencyCannulationDevice designGeneralizationLearningMedical devicePerformancePeripheral intravenous cannulationPeripheral intravenous catheterizationTransfer

Identifiers

PMID31832244
PMCPMC6868858
OpenAlexW2991365436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.