Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832187›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2019

Unidirectional animal-to-human transmission of methicillin-resistant

Mattia Pirolo, Daniela Visaggio, Angela Gioffrè, Irene Artuso, Monica Gherardi, Grazia Pavia, Pasquale Samele, Lucia Ciambrone, Rossella Di Natale, Giovanna Spatari and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Multi-Host PathogenAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Emergence ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mattia Pirolo *1Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Viale G. Marconi 446, 00146 Rome, Italy.
Daniela Visaggio *1Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Viale G. Marconi 446, 00146 Rome, Italy.
Angela Gioffrè *Department of Medicine, Epidemiology, Workplace and Environmental Hygiene, Lamezia Terme Research Centre, INAIL - National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work, Lamezia Terme, Italy.
Irene Artuso1Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Viale G. Marconi 446, 00146 Rome, Italy.
Monica Gherardi3Department of Medicine, Epidemiology, Workplace and Environmental Hygiene, Monte Porzio Catone Research Centre, INAIL - National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work, Rome, Italy.
Grazia Pavia4Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Catanzaro, Italy.
Pasquale SameleDepartment of Medicine, Epidemiology, Workplace and Environmental Hygiene, Lamezia Terme Research Centre, INAIL - National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work, Lamezia Terme, Italy.
Lucia Ciambrone4Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Catanzaro, Italy.
Rossella Di Natale5Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dental, Morphological and Functional Investigations, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giovanna Spatari5Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dental, Morphological and Functional Investigations, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Francesco Casalinuovo4Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Catanzaro, Italy.
Paolo Visca1Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Viale G. Marconi 446, 00146 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6128-7039
Roma Tre University · ITIstituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Methods: Between January and March 2018, 88 workers from 32 farms where we had previously performed a survey for MRSA colonization of farmed pigs, were sampled by nasal swabbing. A follow-up investigation was conducted on seven workers 1 year after primary screening. MRSA isolates were characterized by MLST, Results: The overall colonization rate of MRSA in swine farm workers was 21.6%, being significantly higher in intensive farms and in workers with direct animal contact. All human MRSA isolates were multi-drug resistant, belonged to the ST398 livestock clade, and did not carry Panton-Valentine leukocidin and enterotoxin genes. Notably, 94.1% of human MRSA isolates belonged to the same epidemiological type as swine MRSA isolates from the corresponding farm. Persistent MRSA carriage was documented in some workers 1 year after primary sampling. Conclusions: We report a high prevalence of MRSA among swine farm workers, with higher colonization rates associated with intensive breeding and animal exposure. Our findings suggest unidirectional animal-to-human transmission of LA-MRSA and denote the high zoonotic transmissibility of the ST398 livestock clade.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAsymptomatic InfectionsFarmersFarmsFemaleHumansItalyMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceBiological riskEpidemiological typingFarmingLivestockMRSAOccupational medicineStaphylococcus aureusSwineZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID31832187
PMCPMC6873530
OpenAlexW2990749051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.