Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832186›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2019

Appropriateness of antimicrobial use among septic patients managed by the critical care response team: an opportunity for improvement through de-escalation.

Saad M Al-Qahtani, Henry Baffoe-Bonnie, Aiman El-Saed, Majid Alshamrani, Abdullah Algwizani, Ali Alaklabi, Khuloud AlJoudi, Nahlah Albaalharith, Azzam Mohammed, Sajid Hussain and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prevalence, treatment, and outcomes of sepsis during rapid response team calls: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Saad M Al-Qahtani1Intensive Care Medicine Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Henry Baffoe-Bonnie3Infection Prevention and Control Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aiman El-Saed2King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Majid Alshamrani2King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah AlgwizaniSaudi Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Alaklabi2King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khuloud AlJoudi6Pharmacy Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nahlah Albaalharith1Intensive Care Medicine Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Azzam Mohammed3Infection Prevention and Control Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sajid Hussain1Intensive Care Medicine Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hanan H Balkhy2King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Most septic patients managed by critical care response teams (CCRT) are prescribed antimicrobials. Nevertheless, data evaluating their appropriateness are lacking both locally and internationally. The objective was to assess antimicrobial use among septic and non-septic patients managed by CCRT. Setting: Case-control design was used to compare septic (cases) and non-septic (controls) CCRT patients at tertiary care setting. The frequency of antimicrobial use was assessed before and after CCRT activation. The appropriateness of antimicrobial use was assessed at day four post-CCRT, based on standard recommendations, clinical assessment, and culture results. Main results: A total of 157 cases and 158 controls were included. The average age was 61.1 ± 20.4 years, and 54.6% were males, with minor differences between groups. The use of any antimicrobial was 100.0% in cases and 87.3% in controls ( Conclusions: Empiric use and inadequate de-escalation of broad-spectrum antimicrobials were major causes for inappropriate antimicrobial use in CCRT patients. Our findings highlight the necessity of urgent implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program, including training and auditing of antimicrobial prescriptions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipCase-Control StudiesCritical CareDisease ManagementDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobialAppropriatenessCritical care responseResistanceSaudi ArabiaSepsis

Identifiers

PMID31832186
PMCPMC6869254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.