Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832155›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Evolutionary history predicts high-impact invasions by herbivorous insects.

Angela M Mech, Kathryn A Thomas, Travis D Marsico, Daniel A Herms, Craig R Allen, Matthew P Ayres, Kamal J K Gandhi, Jessica Gurevitch, Nathan P Havill, Ruth A Hufbauer and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Objective risk assessment of bark and ambrosia beetles non-indigenous to North America.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Towards a phylogenetic ecology of plant pests and pathogens.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Pest pressure relates to similarity of crops and native plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Phylogenetic escape from pests reduces pesticides on some crop plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Angela M MechSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences University of Washington Seattle Washington.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-2464
Kathryn A ThomasSouthwest Biological Science Center U.S. Geological Survey Tucson Arizona.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7131-8564
Travis D MarsicoDepartment of Biological Sciences Arkansas State University Jonesboro Arkansas.
Daniel A HermsThe Davey Tree Expert Company Kent Ohio.
Craig R AllenNebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Unit School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska.
Matthew P AyresDepartment of Biological Sciences Dartmouth College Hanover New Hampshire.
Kamal J K GandhiD.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia Athens Georgia.
Jessica GurevitchDepartment of Ecology and Evolution Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York.
Nathan P HavillNorthern Research Station USDA Forest Service Hamden Connecticut.
Ruth A HufbauerDepartment of Bioagricultural Science and Pest Management Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado.
Andrew M LiebholdUSDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Morgantown West Virginia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7427-6534
Kenneth F RaffaDepartment of Entomology University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin.
Ashley N SchulzDepartment of Biological Sciences Arkansas State University Jonesboro Arkansas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-0664
Daniel R UdenNebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Unit Department of Agronomy and Horticulture School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska.
Patrick C TobinSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences University of Washington Seattle Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A long-standing goal of invasion biology is to identify factors driving highly variable impacts of non-native species. Although hypotheses exist that emphasize the role of evolutionary history (e.g., enemy release hypothesis & defense-free space hypothesis), predicting the impact of non-native herbivorous insects has eluded scientists for over a century.Using a census of all 58 non-native conifer-specialist insects in North America, we quantified the contribution of over 25 factors that could affect the impact they have on their novel hosts, including insect traits (fecundity, voltinism, native range, etc.), host traits (shade tolerance, growth rate, wood density, etc.), and evolutionary relationships (between native and novel hosts and insects).We discovered that divergence times between native and novel hosts, the shade and drought tolerance of the novel host, and the presence of a coevolved congener on a shared host, were more predictive of impact than the traits of the invading insect. These factors built upon each other to strengthen our ability to predict the risk of a non-native insect becoming invasive. This research is the first to empirically support historically assumed hypotheses about the importance of evolutionary history as a major driver of impact of non-native herbivorous insects.Our novel, integrated model predicts whether a non-native insect not yet present in North America will have a one in 6.5 to a one in 2,858 chance of causing widespread mortality of a conifer species if established (

Indexed as

evolutionary historyherbivoreinvasive insectnon‐native speciesrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID31832155
PMCPMC6854116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.