ArticleBiomicrofluidics2019
Spectrophotometry in modular microfluidic architectures.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gold Nanoparticles in Bladder Cancer Applications: A Paradigm Shift from Diagnostic Tools to Integrated Theranostic Platforms.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Modular Microfluidics: Current Status and Future Prospects.Micromachines · 2022Review
- The Rise of the OM-LoC: Opto-Microfluidic Enabled Lab-on-Chip.Micromachines · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Assays for chemical biomarkers are a vital component in the ecosystem of noninvasive disease state assessment, many of which rely on quantification by colorimetric reactions or spectrophotometry. While modern advances in microfluidic technology have enabled such classes of devices to be employed in medical applications, the challenge has persisted in adapting the necessary tooling and equipment to integrate spectrophotometry into a microfluidic workflow. Spectrophotometric measurements are common in biomarker assays because of straightforward acquisition, ease of developing the assay's mechanism of action, and ease of tuning sensitivity. In this work, 3D-printed, discrete microfluidic elements are leveraged to develop a model system for assaying hyaluronidase, a urinary biomarker of bladder cancer, via absorbance spectrometry of gold nanoparticle aggregation. Compared to laboratory microtiter plate-based techniques, the system demonstrates equivalent performance while remaining competitive in terms of resource and operation requirements and cost.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.