ReviewEJIFCC2019
Immune Cellular Evaluation Following Newborn Screening For Severe T and B Cell Lymphopenia.
Review in EJIFCC, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased mortality in infants with abnormal T-cell receptor excision circles.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- Newborn Screening for SCID and Other Severe Primary Immunodeficiency in the Polish-German Transborder Area: Experience From the First 14 Months of Collaboration.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) for severe T and/or B cell lymphopenia to identify neonates with severe combined immunodeficiencies (SCID) or agammaglobulinemia rapidly after birth has paved its way into clinical practice. Debate exists on the concept and strategy for rapid verification and stratification of the cellular immune status of positively screened infants. We provide impulses for harmonization of flow cytometric approaches to allow rapid integration in the growing number of immunological laboratories involved in follow-up and subdivision of SCID and non-SCID entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31832054PMC6893892W2995186157What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.