Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31832022›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2019

Amphicrine carcinoma of the stomach and intestine: a clinicopathologic and pan-cancer transcriptome analysis of a distinct entity.

Dan Huang, Fei Ren, Shujuan Ni, Cong Tan, Weiwei Weng, Meng Zhang, Midie Xu, Lei Wang, Qinghua Xu, Weiqi Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Genetic alterations in gastric amphicrine carcinomas and comparison with gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dan Huang1Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032 People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7001-1325
Fei Ren1Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032 People's Republic of China.
Shujuan Ni1Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032 People's Republic of China.
Cong Tan1Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032 People's Republic of China.
Weiwei Weng1Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032 People's Republic of China.
Meng Zhang1Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032 People's Republic of China.
Midie Xu1Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032 People's Republic of China.
Lei Wang1Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032 People's Republic of China.
Qinghua XuCanHelp Genomics, Hangzhou, Zhejiang People's Republic of China.
Weiqi Sheng1Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032 People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8726-277X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimAmphicrine carcinoma, in which endocrine and epithelial cell constituents are present within the same cell, is very rare. This study characterized the clinicopathologic and survival analysis of this tumor, further compared the genetic diversities among amphicrine carcinoma and other tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes of amphicrine carcinoma in this study were analyzed. The pan-cancer transcriptome assay was utilized to compare the genetic expression profile of this entity with that of conventional adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine tumors.

resultsTen cases (all in male patients) were identified in the stomach or intestine, with a median patient age of 62 years. There were characteristic patterns in the tumors: tubular, fusion or single-file growth of goblet- or signet ring-like cells. Four tumors were classified as low-grade and 6 as high-grade according to the histologic architecture. All cases were positive for neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin and chromogranin A) and showed intracellular mucin in the amphicrine components. Four cases exhibited mRNA expression patterns showing transcriptional homogeneity with conventional adenocarcinomas and genetic diversity from neuroendocrine tumors. During the follow-up period, 3 patients died of disease, all of whom had high-grade tumors. Patients with high-grade amphicrine carcinoma had worse outcomes than those with low-grade tumors.

conclusionsThis study confirms the morphological, immunostaining and transcriptome alterations in amphicrine carcinoma distinct from those in conventional adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine tumors, but additional studies are warranted to determine the biological behavior and therapeutic response.

Indexed as

AmphicrineGastrointestinal tractPan-cancer transcriptome analysisPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID31832022
PMCPMC6873408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.