Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31831851›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Universality of indeterminate growth in lizards rejected: the micro-CT reveals contrasting timing of growth cartilage persistence in iguanas, agamas, and chameleons.

Petra Frýdlová, Jana Mrzílková, Martin Šeremeta, Jan Křemen, Jan Dudák, Jan Žemlička, Pavel Němec, Petr Velenský, Jiří Moravec, Daniel Koleška and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Life-History Traits ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Growth AxisGenes · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Petra FrýdlováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-12844, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-9743
Jana MrzílkováSpecialized laboratory of experimental imaging, Ruská 2411/87, CZ-10000, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9474-5040
Martin ŠeremetaSpecialized laboratory of experimental imaging, Ruská 2411/87, CZ-10000, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan KřemenSpecialized laboratory of experimental imaging, Ruská 2411/87, CZ-10000, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan DudákInstitute of Experimental and Applied Physics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Husova 5, CZ-11000, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4064-1246
Jan ŽemličkaInstitute of Experimental and Applied Physics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Husova 5, CZ-11000, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4816-4827
Pavel NěmecDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-12844, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0277-0239
Petr VelenskýPrague Zoo, U Trojského Zámku 3, CZ-17100, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiří MoravecDepartment of Zoology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ-19300, Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniel KoleškaDepartment of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-16500, Prague, Czech Republic.
Veronika ZahradníčkováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-12844, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš JirásekZoological and Botanical Garden Pilsen, Pod Vinicemi 9, CZ-30116, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Petr KodymNational Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 48, CZ-10042, Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniel FryntaDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-12844, Prague, Czech Republic. frynta@centrum.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1375-7972
Petr ZachSpecialized laboratory of experimental imaging, Ruská 2411/87, CZ-10000, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-2972
Charles University · CZCzech Technical University in Prague · CZCzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZNational Institute of Public Health · CZNational Museum · CZPrague Botanical Garden · CZPrague Zoo · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Squamate reptiles are considered to exhibit indeterminate growth. Nevertheless, current literature disputes the available definitions of this growth type, presents new theoretical models, and questions its universality in cold-blooded vertebrates. We have followed up on our previous research employing micro-CT to explore growth plate cartilage (GPC) in the epiphysis of long bones, which is responsible for longitudinal skeletal growth by the endochondral ossification process. We focused on numerous and highly diversified group of the Iguania clade comprising Acrodonta (agamas and chameleons) and Pleurodonta ("iguanas"). We recorded the absence of GPC in most of the examined adult Pleurodonta specimens and interpret it as an irreversible arrest of skeletal growth. This finding clearly rejects the universality of indeterminate growth in lizards. On the other hand, we found apparent GPC preservation in most of the adult specimens belonging to Acrodonta. This suggests a preserved ability to continue body growth throughout most of their life. We discuss the uncovered disparity between Acrodonta and Pleurodonta and emphasize the importance of GPC degradation timing.

Indexed as

CartilageGrowth PlatePhylogenyX-Ray MicrotomographyAnimalsLizards

Identifiers

PMID31831851
PMCPMC6908584
OpenAlexW2995902410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.