Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31831758›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Analysis of neuronal ensemble activity reveals the pitfalls and shortcomings of rotation dynamics.

Mikhail A Lebedev, Alexei Ossadtchi, Nil Adell Mill, Núria Armengol Urpí, Maria R Cervera, Miguel A L Nicolelis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Why the simplest explanation isn't always the best.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Phantom oscillations in principal component analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Neural tuning and representational geometry.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Computation Through Neural Population Dynamics.Annual review of neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mikhail A LebedevDuke Center for Neuroengineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Alexei OssadtchiCenter for Bioelectric Interfaces of the Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Nil Adell MillInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0676-7547
Núria Armengol UrpíD-MAVT ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maria R CerveraInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Miguel A L NicolelisDuke Center for Neuroengineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. nicoleli@neuro.duke.edu.
Duke University · USSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHETH Zurich · CHNational Research University Higher School of Economics · RU

Funding

Interval Timing and Motor Programming by Cortico-Striatal EnsemblesR01NS073952 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLELIS, MIGUEL A. L. · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
A Virtual Reality Simulator to Study VLSBA and Test Brain-Actuating TechnologiesDP1OD006798 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLELIS, MIGUEL A. L. · 2010 to 2011
$1.6M
NIH HHS DP1 OD006798NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Back in 2012, Churchland and his colleagues proposed that "rotational dynamics", uncovered through linear transformations of multidimensional neuronal data, represent a fundamental type of neuronal population processing in a variety of organisms, from the isolated leech central nervous system to the primate motor cortex. Here, we evaluated this claim using Churchland's own data and simple simulations of neuronal responses. We observed that rotational patterns occurred in neuronal populations when (1) there was a temporal sequence in peak firing rates exhibited by individual neurons, and (2) this sequence remained consistent across different experimental conditions. Provided that such a temporal order of peak firing rates existed, rotational patterns could be easily obtained using a rather arbitrary computer simulation of neural activity; modeling of any realistic properties of motor cortical responses was not needed. Additionally, arbitrary traces, such as Lissajous curves, could be easily obtained from Churchland's data with multiple linear regression. While these observations suggest that temporal sequences of neuronal responses could be visualized as rotations with various methods, we express doubt about Churchland et al.'s bold assessment that such rotations are related to "an unexpected yet surprisingly simple structure in the population response", which "explains many of the confusing features of individual neural responses". Instead, we argue that their approach provides little, if any, insight on the underlying neuronal mechanisms employed by neuronal ensembles to encode motor behaviors in any species.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalAnimalsHaplorhiniMotor CortexNeurons

Identifiers

PMID31831758
PMCPMC6908571
OpenAlexW2995064991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.