Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31831562›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2020

Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel SHIP1 Phosphatase Activator for Inhibition of PI3K Signaling in Malignant B Cells.

Elizabeth A Lemm, Beatriz Valle-Argos, Lindsay D Smith, Johanna Richter, Yohannes Gebreselassie, Matthew J Carter, Jana Karolova, Michael Svaton, Karel Helman, Nicola J Weston-Bell and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Drug Resistance in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Elizabeth A Lemm *Cancer Research UK Centre, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Beatriz Valle-Argos *Cancer Research UK Centre, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Lindsay D SmithCancer Research UK Centre, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Johanna RichterCancer Research UK Centre, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2043-0003
Yohannes GebreselassieCancer Research UK Centre, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Matthew J CarterCentre for Cancer Immunology, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jana KarolovaInstitute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3828-6000
Michael SvatonInstitute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karel HelmanFaculty of Informatics and Statistics, University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7141-8074
Nicola J Weston-BellCancer Research UK Centre, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0075-7276
Laura KarydisCancer Research UK Centre, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Chris T WilliamsonAquinox Pharmaceuticals (Canada) Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Georg LenzDepartment of Medicine A for Hematology, Oncology, and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jeremy PettigrewAquinox Pharmaceuticals (Canada) Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Curtis HarwigAquinox Pharmaceuticals (Canada) Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Freda K StevensonCancer Research UK Centre, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Mark CraggCentre for Cancer Immunology, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2077-089X
Francesco ForconiCancer Research UK Centre, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2211-1831
Andrew J SteeleCancer Research UK Centre, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0667-1596
Jennifer CrossAquinox Pharmaceuticals (Canada) Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lloyd MackenzieAquinox Pharmaceuticals (Canada) Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Pavel KlenerInstitute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7786-9378
Graham PackhamCancer Research UK Centre, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. gpackham@soton.ac.uk.
University of Southampton · GBInimex Pharmaceuticals (Canada) · CACharles University · CZPrague University of Economics and Business · CZUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 23669Cancer Research UK 29370Cancer Research UK A15581Cancer Research UK A18087Cancer Research UK A23669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePI3K signaling is a common feature of B-cell neoplasms, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and PI3K inhibitors have been introduced into the clinic. However, there remains a clear need to develop new strategies to target PI3K signaling. PI3K activity is countered by Src homology domain 2-containing inositol-5'-phosphatase 1 (SHIP1) and, here, we have characterized the activity of a novel SHIP1 activator, AQX-435, in preclinical models of B-cell malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL

design

resultsPharmacologic activation of SHIP1 using AQX-435 was sufficient to inhibit anti-IgM-induced PI3K-mediated signaling, including induction of AKT phosphorylation and MYC expression, without effects on upstream SYK phosphorylation. AQX-435 also cooperated with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib to enhance inhibition of anti-IgM-induced AKT phosphorylation. AQX-435 induced caspase-dependent apoptosis of CLL cells preferentially as compared with normal B cells, and overcame

conclusionsOur results using AQX-435 demonstrate that SHIP1 activation may be an effective novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of B-cell neoplasms, alone or in combination with ibrutinib.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell Line, TumorEnzyme ActivatorsFemaleHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMiceMice, Inbred NODPhosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-Trisphosphate 5-PhosphatasesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesSesquiterpenesSignal TransductionXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsEnzyme ActivatorsINPP5D protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-Trisphosphate 5-PhosphatasesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesSesquiterpenes

Identifiers

PMID31831562
PMCPMC7124891
OpenAlexW2996325740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.