Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31831548›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Development of consumer information leaflets for deprescribing in older hospital inpatients: a mixed-methods study.

Natali Jokanovic, Parisa Aslani, Sophie Carter, Mai Duong, Danijela Gnjidic, Jesse Jansen, David Le Couteur, Sarah Hilmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Co-design of medication management guidance tools for people living with dementia and carers at discharge.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Optimising medication management during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of pharmacy practice and research : official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natali JokanovicDepartments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1830-9930
Parisa AslaniSydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sophie CarterDepartments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Mai DuongDepartments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Danijela GnjidicSydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jesse JansenSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
David Le CouteurCentre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah HilmerDepartments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia sarah.hilmer@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop information leaflets for older inpatients and/or their carers to support deprescribing of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines/Z-drugs and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

designAn iterative mixed-methods approach involving face-to-face user testing and semi-structured interviews was performed over three rounds with consumers and hospital health professionals.

settingSydney, New South Wales, Australia.

participantsThirty-seven consumers (or their carers) aged 65 years or older admitted to hospital in the previous 5 years and taking at least one regular medicine (not the medicine tested) completed user testing. Health professionals included a convenience sample of seven pharmacists and five doctors.

methodsThe antipsychotic leaflet was tested in round 1 (consumers, n=10) and revised and retested in round 2 (consumers, n=9; health professionals, n=5). Findings from rounds 1 and 2 informed the design of the benzodiazepine/Z-drug and PPI leaflets tested in round 3 (benzodiazepine/Z-drug consumers, n=9; health professionals, n=7; PPI consumers, n=9). Findings from round 3 informed the final design of all leaflets. Consumer user testing involved 12-13 questions to evaluate consumers' ability to locate and understand information in the leaflet. Usability by health professionals was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS).

resultsAt least 80% of consumers correctly found and understood the deprescribing information in the leaflets (9 of 12 information points in round 1 (antipsychotic); 10 of 12 in round 2; 12 of 13 (benzodiazepine/Z-drug) and 11 of 12 (PPI) in round 3). Consumers perceived the leaflets to be informative, well-designed and useful aids for ongoing medication management. The SUS scores obtained from health professionals were 91.0±3.8 for the antipsychotic leaflet and 86.4±6.6 for the benzodiazepine/Z-drug leaflet, indicating excellent usability.

conclusionsUnderstandable and easy-to-use consumer information leaflets were developed and tested by consumers and health professionals. The feasibility and utility of these leaflets to support deprescribing at transitions of care should be explored in clinical practice.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsPamphletsAgedAntipsychotic AgentsAustraliaBenzodiazepinesData DisplayFemaleGeriatricsHumansInappropriate PrescribingInformation DisseminationMaleProton Pump InhibitorsAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesProton Pump Inhibitorsdeprescribinggeriatric medicinehealth professionalspatient information leafletusability testinguser testing

Identifiers

PMID31831548
PMCPMC6924866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.