Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31831078›Full record

ReviewMicrobiome2019

Beneath the surface: community assembly and functions of the coral skeleton microbiome.

Francesco Ricci, Vanessa Rossetto Marcelino, Linda L Blackall, Michael Kühl, Mónica Medina, Heroen Verbruggen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco RicciSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Australia.
Vanessa Rossetto MarcelinoMarie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Sydney Medical School, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Linda L BlackallSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Australia.
Michael KühlMarine Biological Section, University of Copenhagen, Strandpromenaden 5, DK-3000, Helsingør, Denmark.
Mónica MedinaPennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Heroen VerbruggenSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Australia. heroen@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6305-4749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral microbial ecology is a burgeoning field, driven by the urgency of understanding coral health and slowing reef loss due to climate change. Coral resilience depends on its microbiota, and both the tissue and the underlying skeleton are home to a rich biodiversity of eukaryotic, bacterial and archaeal species that form an integral part of the coral holobiont. New techniques now enable detailed studies of the endolithic habitat, and our knowledge of the skeletal microbial community and its eco-physiology is increasing rapidly, with multiple lines of evidence for the importance of the skeletal microbiota in coral health and functioning. Here, we review the roles these organisms play in the holobiont, including nutritional exchanges with the coral host and decalcification of the host skeleton. Microbial metabolism causes steep physico-chemical gradients in the skeleton, creating micro-niches that, along with dispersal limitation and priority effects, define the fine-scale microbial community assembly. Coral bleaching causes drastic changes in the skeletal microbiome, which can mitigate bleaching effects and promote coral survival during stress periods, but may also have detrimental effects. Finally, we discuss the idea that the skeleton may function as a microbial reservoir that can promote recolonization of the tissue microbiome following dysbiosis and help the coral holobiont return to homeostasis.

Indexed as

Coral ReefsAnimalsAnthozoaArchaeaBacteriaBiodiversityMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID31831078
PMCPMC6909473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.