Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31831045›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2019

The urethral position may shift due to urethral catheter placement in the treatment planning for prostate radiation therapy.

Yasuhiro Dekura, Kentaro Nishioka, Takayuki Hashimoto, Naoki Miyamoto, Ryusuke Suzuki, Takaaki Yoshimura, Ryuji Matsumoto, Takahiro Osawa, Takashige Abe, Yoichi M Ito and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. PURE-MRI: An international study assessing physician accuracy in delineating the prostate and urethra on prostate MRI.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yasuhiro DekuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North-15, West-7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Kentaro NishiokaDepartment of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North-15, West-7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan. k.nishioka@med.hokudai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-7603
Takayuki HashimotoDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North-15, West-7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Naoki MiyamotoGlobal Station for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Global Institute for Cooperative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, North-15, West-7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Ryusuke SuzukiDepartment of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, North-14, West-5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Takaaki YoshimuraDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, North-12, West-5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan.
Ryuji MatsumotoDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North-15, West-7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Takahiro OsawaDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North-15, West-7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Takashige AbeDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North-15, West-7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Yoichi M ItoDepartment of Statistical Data Science, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 10-3, Midori-cho, Tachikawa, Tokyo, 190-0014, Japan.
Nobuo ShinoharaDepartment of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North-15, West-7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Hiroki ShiratoDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North-15, West-7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Shinichi ShimizuDepartment of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North-15, West-7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPHealth Sciences University of Hokkaido · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPThe Institute of Statistical Mathematics · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18H02758Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K15535Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K15577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the best method to contour the planning organ at risk volume (PRV) for the urethra, this study aimed to investigate the displacement of a Foley catheter in the urethra with a soft and thin guide-wire.

methodsFor each patient, the study used two sets of computed tomography (CT) images for radiation treatment planning (RT-CT): (1) set with a Foley urethral catheter (4.0 mm diameter) plus a guide-wire (0.46 mm diameter) in the first RT-CT and (2) set with a guide-wire alone in the second CT recorded 2 min after the first RT-CT. Using three fiducial markers in the prostate for image fusion, the displacement between the catheter and the guide-wire in the prostatic urethra was calculated. In 155 consecutive patients treated between 2011 and 2017, 5531 slices of RT-CT were evaluated.

resultsAssuming that ≥3.0 mm of difference between the catheter and the guide-wire position was a significant displacement, the urethra with the catheter was displaced significantly from the urethra with the guide-wire alone in > 20% of the RT-CT slices in 23.2% (36/155) of the patients. The number of patients who showed ≥3.0 mm anterior displacement with the catheter in ≥20% RT-CT slices was significantly larger at the superior segment (38/155) than at the middle (14/155) and inferior segments (18/155) of the prostatic urethra (p < 0.0167).

conclusionsThe urethral position with a Foley catheter is different from the urethral position with a thin and soft guide-wire in a significant proportion of the patients. This should be taken into account for the PRV of the urethra to ensure precise radiotherapy such as in urethra-sparing radiotherapy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrachytherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesUrethraUrinary CathetersProstate cancerRadiotherapyUrethra

Identifiers

PMID31831045
PMCPMC6909476
OpenAlexW2996089475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.