Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31831034›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2019

Family planning counseling and its associations with modern contraceptive use, initiation, and continuation in rural Uttar Pradesh, India.

Nabamallika Dehingia, Anvita Dixit, Sarah Averbach, Vikas Choudhry, Arnab Dey, Dharmendra Chandurkar, Priya Nanda, Jay G Silverman, Anita Raj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Contraceptive use among women who desire no more children in Indonesia: a cross-sectional study of a national survey.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nabamallika DehingiaCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA. ndehingi@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-9050
Anvita DixitCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA.
Sarah AverbachDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Vikas ChoudhrySambodhi Research and Communications Pvt. Ltd., Noida, India.
Arnab DeySambodhi Research and Communications Pvt. Ltd., Noida, India.
Dharmendra ChandurkarSambodhi Research and Communications Pvt. Ltd., Noida, India.
Priya NandaBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Jay G SilvermanCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA.
Anita RajCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA.

Funding

UC San Diego Womens Reproductive Health Research ProgramK12HD001259 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CYNTHIA GYAMFI-BANNERMAN · 1999 to 2026
$9.1M
Enhancing male participation in interventions to prevent unintended pregnancyR01HD084453 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI RAJ, ANITA · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1083531NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001259NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084453NIH HHS R01HD084453-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe examine the association between the quality of family planning (FP) counseling received in past 24 months, and current modern contraceptive use, initiation, and continuation, among a sample of women in rural Uttar Pradesh, India.

methodsThis study included data from a longitudinal study with two rounds of representative household survey (2014 and 2016), with currently married women of age 15-49 years; the analysis excluded women who were already using a permanent method of contraceptive during the first round of survey and who reported discontinuation because they wanted to be pregnant (N = 1398). We measured quality of FP counseling using four items on whether women were informed of advantages and disadvantages of different methods, were told of method(s) that are appropriate for them, whether their questions were answered, and whether they perceived the counseling to be helpful. Positive responses to every item was categorized as higher quality counseling, vs lower quality counseling for positive response to less than four items. Outcome variables included modern contraceptive use during the second round of survey, and a variable categorizing women based on their contraceptive use behavior during the two rounds: continued-users, new-users, discontinued-users, and non-users.

resultsAround 22% had received any FP counseling; only 4% received higher-quality counseling. Those who received lower-quality FP counseling had 2.42x the odds of reporting current use of any modern contraceptive method (95% CI: 1.56-3.76), and those who received higher quality FP counseling at 4.14x the odds of reporting modern contraceptive use (95% CI: 1.72-9.99), as compared to women reporting no FP counseling. Women receiving higher-quality counseling also had higher likelihood of continued use (ARRR 5.93; 95% CI: 1.97-17.83), as well as new use or initiation (ARRR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.44-12.35) of modern contraceptives. Receipt of lower-quality counseling also showed statistically significant associations with continued and new use of modern contraceptives, but the effect sizes were smaller than those for higher-quality counseling.

conclusionsFindings suggest the value of FP counseling. With a patient-centered approach to counseling, continued use of modern contraceptives can be supported among married women of reproductive age. Unfortunately, FP counseling, particularly higher-quality FP counseling remains rare.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive Agents, FemaleCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansIndiaLongitudinal StudiesMarriageMiddle AgedPregnancyRural PopulationSex EducationContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive continuationFP counselingFP qualityIndiaModern contraceptive use

Identifiers

PMID31831034
PMCPMC6909586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.