Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31831029›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

Diagnostic accuracy of MRA and MRI for the bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis.

Tao Huang, Jian Liu, Yupeng Ma, Dongsheng Zhou, Liang Chen, Fanxiao Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Novel methods to diagnose rotator cuff tear and predict post-operative Re-tear: Radiomics models.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder.Polish journal of radiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tao HuangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Yantai Shan Hospital, Yantai, Shandong Province, China.
Jian LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Zhangqiu District People's Hospital of Jinan City, Zhangqiu District, Jinan City, Shandong Province, China.
Yupeng MaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Yantai Shan Hospital, Yantai, Shandong Province, China.
Dongsheng ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, No.324, Road Jing Wu Wei Qi, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China.
Liang ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Western Hospital, No. 4, Road Duan Xing Xi, Jinan, 250022, Shandong, China. 15168863278@139.com.
Fanxiao LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, No.324, Road Jing Wu Wei Qi, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China. woshi631@126.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1412-849X
Shandong University · CNYantaishan Hospital · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CNZhangqiu City People's Hospital · CN

Funding

China Scholarship Council 201808080126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous quantitatively studies have focused on the diagnosis of bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCTs); however, the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR arthrography (MRA) remains inconclusive. This study was performed systematically to compare the diagnostic value of MRA and MRI for the bursal-sided partial-thickness RCTs.

methodsThree electronic databases, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were utilized to retrieve articles comparing the diagnostic value of MRA and MRI for detecting bursal-sided partial-thickness RCTs. After screening and diluting out the articles that met the inclusion criteria to be used for statistical analysis, the pooled evaluation indexes include sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsTwelve studies involving 1740 patients and 1741 shoulders were identified. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC of MRA to diagnose bursal-sided partial-thickness RCTs were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.85), 0.98 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99), 73.01 (95% CI, 35.01-152.26), and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC of MRI were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66-0.86) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.81-0.99), and 37.12 (95% CI, 8.08-170.64) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.85), respectively.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis reveals that MRA and MRI have similar diagnostic value for the diagnosis of bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Indexed as

HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPredictive Value of TestsRotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesSensitivity and SpecificityMRAMRIPartial-thicknessRotator cuff tearShoulder pain

Identifiers

PMID31831029
PMCPMC6909503
OpenAlexW2996665088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.