ArticleBiomedical engineering online2019
Towards the automation of early-stage human embryo development detection.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning applications for human embryo assessment using time-lapse imaging: scoping review.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- Soft Optical Sensor for Embryo Quality Evaluation Based on Multi-Focal Image Fusion and RAG-Enhanced Vision Transformers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Investigating discrepancies in accuracy, agreement and interpretability for single-frame embryo classification tasks conducted by embryologists and deep learning models.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Morphometric Blastocyst Assessment: A Retrospective Study Examining the Relationship Between Blastocyst Diameter and Area and Pregnancy Outcomes in Assisted Reproduction Technology Cycles.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Merging synthetic and real embryo data for advanced AI predictions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- A novel deep learning approach to identify embryo morphokinetics in multiple time lapse systems.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Testing the generalizability and effectiveness of deep learning models among clinics: sperm detection as a pilot study.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Article
- Evolution of Minimally Invasive and Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing: An Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A brief history of artificial intelligence embryo selection: from black-box to glass-box.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in time-lapse system: advances, applications, and future perspectives in reproductive medicine.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Embryo ploidy status classification through computer-assisted morphology assessment.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Delineating the heterogeneity of embryo preimplantation development using automated and accurate morphokinetic annotation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- New frontiers in embryo selection.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Review
- Review of computer vision application in in vitro fertilization: the application of deep learning-based computer vision technology in the world of IVF.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Review
- End-to-end deep learning for recognition of ploidy status using time-lapse videos.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Semantic segmentation of human oocyte images using deep neural networks.Biomedical engineering online · 2021Article
- Fast Multi-Focus Fusion Based on Deep Learning for Early-Stage Embryo Image Enhancement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Homogeneous Ensemble of Robust Pre-defined Neural Network Enables Automated Annotation of Human Embryo Morphokinetics.Journal of reproduction & infertilityArticle
- From the Understanding of Maternal Molecules and Mechanisms to Predicting Embryonic Development.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfertility and subfertility affect a significant proportion of humanity. Assisted reproductive technology has been proven capable of alleviating infertility issues. In vitro fertilisation is one such option whose success is highly dependent on the selection of a high-quality embryo for transfer. This is typically done manually by analysing embryos under a microscope. However, evidence has shown that the success rate of manual selection remains low. The use of new incubators with integrated time-lapse imaging system is providing new possibilities for embryo assessment. As such, we address this problem by proposing an approach based on deep learning for automated embryo quality evaluation through the analysis of time-lapse images. Automatic embryo detection is complicated by the topological changes of a tracked object. Moreover, the algorithm should process a large number of image files of different qualities in a reasonable amount of time.
methodsWe propose an automated approach to detect human embryo development stages during incubation and to highlight embryos with abnormal behaviour by focusing on five different stages. This method encompasses two major steps. First, the location of an embryo in the image is detected by employing a Haar feature-based cascade classifier and leveraging the radiating lines. Then, a multi-class prediction model is developed to identify a total cell number in the embryo using the technique of deep learning.
resultsThe experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves an accuracy of at least 90% in the detection of embryo location. The implemented deep learning approach to identify the early stages of embryo development resulted in an overall accuracy of over 92% using the selected architectures of convolutional neural networks. The most problematic stage was the 3-cell stage, presumably due to its short duration during development.
conclusionThis research contributes to the field by proposing a model to automate the monitoring of early-stage human embryo development. Unlike in other imaging fields, only a few published attempts have involved leveraging deep learning in this field. Therefore, the approach presented in this study could be used in the creation of novel algorithms integrated into the assisted reproductive technology used by embryologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.