Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31830982›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2019

Predictors of contraceptive use among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) aged 15 to 24 years in South Africa: results from the 2012 national population-based household survey.

L Makola, L Mlangeni, M Mabaso, B Chibi, Z Sokhela, Z Silimfe, L Seutlwadi, D Naidoo, S Khumalo, A Mncadi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L MakolaSocial Aspects of Public Health Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa. LMakola@hsrc.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0001-9685-5895
L MlangeniDepartment of Psychology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
M MabasoSocial Aspects of Public Health Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
B ChibiSocial Aspects of Public Health Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
Z SokhelaSocial Aspects of Public Health Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
Z SilimfeSocial Aspects of Public Health Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
L SeutlwadiCritical Studies in Sexualities and Reproduction, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa.
D NaidooSocial Aspects of Public Health Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
S KhumaloHuman and Social Development, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
A MncadiHuman and Social Development, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
K ZumaSocial Aspects of Public Health Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
Human Sciences Research Council · ZARhodes University · ZAUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 5U2GGH000570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a variety of contraceptives being available for women in South Africa, a considerable number of adolescent girls and young women still face challenges in using them. This paper examines socio-demographic and behavioral predictors of using contraceptives among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) aged 15 to 24 years.

methodsA secondary data analysis was conducted based on the 2012 population-based nationally representative multi-stage stratified cluster randomised household survey. Multivariate backward stepwise logistic regression model was used to examine socio-demographic and behavioural factors independently associated with contraceptive use amongst AGYW aged 15 to 24 years in South Africa.

resultsOut of 1460 AGYW, 78% (CI: 73.9-81.7) reported using some form of contraceptives. In the model, contraceptive use was significantly associated with secondary education [OR = 1.8 (1.2-2.7), p = 0.005], having a sexual partner within 5 years of their age [OR = 1.8 (1.2-2.5), p = 0.002], and sexual debut at age 15 years and older [OR = 2.5 (1.3-4.6), p = 0.006]. The likelihood of association decreased with other race groups-White, Coloured, and Indians/Asians [OR = 0.5 (0.3-0.7), p = 0.001], being married [OR = 0.4 (0.2-0.7), p = 0.001], never given birth [OR = 0.7 (0.5-0.9), p = 0.045], coming from rural informal [OR = 0.5 (0.3-0.9), p = 0.010] and rural formal settlements [OR = 0.5 (0.3-0.9), p = 0.020].

conclusionsEvidence suggest that interventions should be tailor-made to meet the needs of AGYW in order to, promote use and access to contraceptives. The results also suggest that family planning interventions should target those who had not given birth in order to reduce unplanned and or unintended pregnancies and associated risk factors. These findings contribute to public health discourse and reproductive health planning for these age groups in the country.

Indexed as

AdolescentContraception BehaviorEducational StatusFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMarital StatusPregnancyRisk FactorsRural PopulationSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAdolescent girls and young womenBehavioral factorsContraceptive useSocio-demographicSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID31830982
PMCPMC6909538
OpenAlexW2995278738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.