ArticleBMC public health2019
'It's not because we don't believe in it...': Headteachers' perceptions of implementing physically active lessons in school.
Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Head Teachers' Perspectives on the Acceptability of an Evidence-Based Mental Health Intervention in Ugandan Schools.Global social welfare : research, policy & practice · 2025Article
- The complexity of promoting physical activity in English state primary schools: an in-depth qualitative analysis of the role of social context.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Implementation Outcomes and Recommendations of Two Physical Activity Interventions: Results from the Danish ACTIVE SCHOOL Feasibility Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- The FIT FIRST 10 dose-response study: evaluation of implementation outcomes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Teacher acceptability of physically active learning in UK secondary schools - a mixed methods study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Physical activity and content in a variety of physically active learning: an observational case study of real-world practices.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Effects of two years of physically active lessons on cognitive indicators in children.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Impact of Non-Physical Education Teachers' Perceptions on the Promotion of Active and Healthy Lifestyles: A Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Exploring the acceptability and feasibility of a whole school approach to physical activity in UK primary schools: a qualitative approach.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Behaviours that prompt primary school teachers to adopt and implement physically active learning: a meta synthesis of qualitative evidence.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021Article
- The impact of physically active learning during the school day on children's physical activity levels, time on task and learning behaviours and academic outcomes.Health education research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionImplementation of school-based physical activity (PA) programmes has proven to be difficult, particularly due to schools' focus on academic performance and lack of organisational support for PA interventions. However, physically active lessons (PA integrated into academic lessons) holds promise as a teaching method that increases children's PA levels without reducing academic time. Headteachers play a significant role in facilitating change in school, but little is known about headteachers' attitudes towards physically active lessons and their benefits. The purpose of this study was to explore headteachers' perceptions of physically active lessons, and identify factors affecting headteachers' acceptance or rejection of physically active lessons implementation.
methodA total of 29 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with headteachers in primary and secondary schools in the city of Stavanger, Norway. Adopting a phenomenological approach, qualitative data were analysed using inductive content analysis.
resultsAlthough most of the headteachers believed that physically active lessons could contribute positively to pupils' health and learning, only four of 29 schools decided to proceed with implementation. Physically active lessons were more likely to be adopted when the intervention addressed a clearly defined priority area at the school. Change overload and lack of in-depth knowledge of physically active lessons' function and intent appeared to be the most important factors for choosing not to implement physically active lessons.
conclusionOne of the major challenges for headteachers was deciding which of the many proposed changes the school should prioritise. If physically active lessons was to be prioritised by headteachers it is very important to communicate thoroughly to the headteachers what the schools can achieve by implementing physically active lessons and how the innovation aligns with school policies and goals. Given the flexibility inherent in physically active lessons and the schools' differing needs and priorities, it was important to emphasise to headteachers that physically active lessons could be adapted to different local school contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.