Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31830937›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

DNA methylation of SFRP1, SFRP2, and WIF1 and prognosis of postoperative colorectal cancer patients.

Xinyan Liu, Jinming Fu, Haoran Bi, Anqi Ge, Tingting Xia, Yupeng Liu, Hongru Sun, Dapeng Li, Yashuang Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. UnravelingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Prostate Cancer Secretome and Membrane Proteome fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinyan LiuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Jinming FuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Haoran BiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Anqi GeDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Tingting XiaDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Yupeng LiuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Hongru SunDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Dapeng LiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Yashuang ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang Province, People's Republic of China. zhao_yashuang@263.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7425-5773
Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 30972539The National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 81473055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs biomarkers, DNA methylation is used to detect colorectal cancer (CRC) and make assessment of CRC prognosis. The published findings showed the association between the methylation of SFRP1, SFRP2, and WIF1, located in the Wnt signaling pathway, and the prognosis of CRC were not consistent. Our study aimed to explore the potential possibility of SFRP1, SFRP2, and WIF1 concomitant promoter methylation as prognostic biomarkers of postoperative CRC patients.

methodsAs a total of 307 sporadic postoperative CRC patients were followed up, we detected SFRP1, SFRP2, and WIF1 methylation obtained from tumor tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues respectively on the basis of methylation-sensitive high resolution melting analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were carried out so as to assess the potential possibility of SFRP1, SFRP2, and WIF1 promoter methylation as predictors of prognosis. Confounders in our study were controlled by Propensity Score (PS) analysis.

resultsThe SFRP1, SFRP2, and WIF1 methylation levels in tumor tissues were significantly higher than that in adjacent non-tumor tissues (P < 0.001). SFRP2 hypermethylation was significantly associated with a favorable clinical outcome at the hazard ratio (HR) of 0.343 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.164-0.718, P = 0.005] and 0.410 (95% CI: 0.200-0.842, P = 0.015) in multivariate Cox regression and PS analysis, respectively. Co-hypermethylation of SFRP1 and SFRP2 was significantly associated with a favorable clinical outcome at the HR of 0.333 (95% CI: 0.159-0.694, P = 0.003) and 0.398 (95% CI: 0.192-0.821, P = 0.013) in multivariate Cox regression and PS analysis, respectively. Co-hypermethylation of SFRP1, SFRP2 and WIF1 was significantly associated with a favorable clinical outcome at the HR of 0.326 (95% CI: 0.117-0.908, P = 0.032) and 0.401 (95% CI: 0.146-1.106, P = 0.077) in multivariate Cox regression and PS analysis, respectively.

conclusionsSFRP1, SFRP2, and WIF1 were frequently hypermethylated in CRC tumor tissues. It was apparent that the promoter hypermethylation of SFRP2 and co-hypermethylation of SFRP1 and SFRP2 might be considered as independent prognostic predictors for survival advantage of postoperative CRC patients.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPrognosisSecreted Frizzled-Related ProteinsWnt Signaling PathwayAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsSecreted Frizzled-Related ProteinsSFRP1 protein, humanSFRP2 protein, humanWIF1 protein, humanColorectal cancerMethylationPrognosisWnt signaling pathway

Identifiers

PMID31830937
PMCPMC6909551
OpenAlexW2996163785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.