Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31830917›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Genomes and secretomes of Ascomycota fungi reveal diverse functions in plant biomass decomposition and pathogenesis.

Jean F Challacombe, Cedar N Hesse, Lisa M Bramer, Lee Ann McCue, Mary Lipton, Samuel Purvine, Carrie Nicora, La Verne Gallegos-Graves, Andrea Porras-Alfaro, Cheryl R Kuske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jean F ChallacombeBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA. Jean.Challacombe@colostate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8624-0413
Cedar N HesseBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Lisa M BramerApplied Statistics & Computational Modeling, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Lee Ann McCueBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 99352, USA.
Mary LiptonApplied Statistics & Computational Modeling, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Samuel PurvineApplied Statistics & Computational Modeling, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Carrie NicoraApplied Statistics & Computational Modeling, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
La Verne Gallegos-GravesBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Andrea Porras-AlfaroDepartment of Biology, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL, 61455, USA.
Cheryl R KuskeBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.

Funding

EMSL High-Performance Mass Spectrometry Facility 47926U.S. Department of Energy Science Focus Area Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dominant fungi in arid grasslands and shrublands are members of the Ascomycota phylum. Ascomycota fungi are important drivers in carbon and nitrogen cycling in arid ecosystems. These fungi play roles in soil stability, plant biomass decomposition, and endophytic interactions with plants. They may also form symbiotic associations with biocrust components or be latent saprotrophs or pathogens that live on plant tissues. However, their functional potential in arid soils, where organic matter, nutrients and water are very low or only periodically available, is poorly characterized.

resultsFive Ascomycota fungi were isolated from different soil crust microhabitats and rhizosphere soils around the native bunchgrass Pleuraphis jamesii in an arid grassland near Moab, UT, USA. Putative genera were Coniochaeta, isolated from lichen biocrust, Embellisia from cyanobacteria biocrust, Chaetomium from below lichen biocrust, Phoma from a moss microhabitat, and Aspergillus from the soil. The fungi were grown in replicate cultures on different carbon sources (chitin, native bunchgrass or pine wood) relevant to plant biomass and soil carbon sources. Secretomes produced by the fungi on each substrate were characterized. Results demonstrate that these fungi likely interact with primary producers (biocrust or plants) by secreting a wide range of proteins that facilitate symbiotic associations. Each of the fungal isolates secreted enzymes that degrade plant biomass, small secreted effector proteins, and proteins involved in either beneficial plant interactions or virulence. Aspergillus and Phoma expressed more plant biomass degrading enzymes when grown in grass- and pine-containing cultures than in chitin. Coniochaeta and Embellisia expressed similar numbers of these enzymes under all conditions, while Chaetomium secreted more of these enzymes in grass-containing cultures.

conclusionsThis study of Ascomycota genomes and secretomes provides important insights about the lifestyles and the roles that Ascomycota fungi likely play in arid grassland, ecosystems. However, the exact nature of those interactions, whether any or all of the isolates are true endophytes, latent saprotrophs or opportunistic phytopathogens, will be the topic of future studies.

Indexed as

Plant Physiological PhenomenaAscomycotaBiomassEndophytesFungal ProteinsGenome, FungalPhylogenyPlantsProteomicsSoil MicrobiologyWhole Genome SequencingFungal ProteinsAridAscomycotaBiocrustFungiGenomeGrasslandLifestylePlantsSecretomeSoil

Identifiers

PMID31830917
PMCPMC6909477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.