Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31830903›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2019

The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding.

Manuel Plate, Richard Bernstein, Andreas Hoppe, Kaspar Bienefeld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Honey Bee Colonies (Insects · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Heritability ofFrontiers in insect science · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Simulation studies to optimize genomic selection in honey bees.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manuel PlateInstitute for Bee Research, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany. manuel.plate@hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2264-1610
Richard BernsteinInstitute for Bee Research, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.
Andreas HoppeInstitute for Bee Research, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.
Kaspar BienefeldInstitute for Bee Research, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.
Institute for Bee Research · DE

Funding

European Commission FP7 KBBE 613960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControlled mating procedures are widely accepted as a key aspect of successful breeding in almost all animal species. In honeybees, however, controlled mating is hard to achieve. Therefore, there have been several attempts to breed honeybees using free-mated queens. In such breeding schemes, selection occurs only on the maternal path since the drone sires are random samples of the population. The success rates of breeding approaches without controlled mating have so far not been investigated on a theoretical or simulation-based level.

methodsStochastic simulation studies were carried out to examine the chances of success in honeybee breeding with and without controlled mating. We investigated the influence of different sizes of breeding populations (500, 1000, 2000 colonies per year) and unselected passive populations (0, 500, 1000, 2000, infinitely many colonies per year) on selection for a maternally (queen) and directly (worker group) influenced trait with moderate ([Formula: see text]) or strong ([Formula: see text]) negative correlation between the two effects. The simulations described 20 years of selection.

resultsOur simulations showed a reduction of breeding success between 47 and 99% if mating was not controlled. In the most drastic cases, practically no genetic gain could be generated without controlled mating. We observed that in the trade-off between selection for direct or maternal effects, the absence of mating control leads to a shift in favor of maternal effects. Moreover, we describe the implications of different breeding strategies on the unselected passive population that benefits only indirectly via the transfer of queens or drones from the breeding population. We show that genetic gain in the passive population develops parallel to that of the breeding population. However, we found a genetic lag that became significantly smaller as more breeding queens served as dams of queens in the passive population.

conclusionsWe conclude that even when unwanted admixture of subspecies can be excluded in natural matings, controlled mating is imperative for successful breeding efforts. This is especially highlighted by the strong positive impact that controlled mating in the breeding population has on the unselected passive population.

Indexed as

BreedingAnimalsBeesFemaleModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID31830903
PMCPMC6907340
OpenAlexW2996369317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.