ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2019
The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reconsidering the Selection Strategy in a Flemish Honey Bee Breeding Program: Towards Selection by Exclusion.Insects · 2026Article
- Establishing standards for genome wide association studies in eusocial insects through a case study in honey bees.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Conservation of Honeybee (Apis mellifera) Intraspecific Diversity Through Reproductive Science and Technology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Human-mediated introgression and Varroa destructor shaped the genetic structure of honey bee populations in the Azores.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Investigating mating reliability and drone congregation areas on an island in Lake Neusiedl (Austria) for the potential establishment of a mating station for honey bee breeding.Archives animal breeding · 2025Article
- Inferring Long-Term and Short-Term Determinants of Genetic Diversity in Honey Bees: Beekeeping Impact and Conservation Strategies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Development of germline progenitors in larval queen honeybee ovaries.Biology open · 2024Article
- The number of drones to inseminate a queen with has little potential for optimization of honeybee breeding programs.Hereditas · 2024Article
- Article
- Uncertainty in the mating strategy of honeybees causes bias and unreliability in the estimates of genetic parameters.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Comparison of pooled semen insemination and single colony insemination as sustainable honeybee breeding strategies.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Article
- Honey Bee Colonies (Insects · 2023Article
- SIMplyBee: an R package to simulate honeybee populations and breeding programs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Article
- Heritability ofFrontiers in insect science · 2023Article
- Influence of model selection and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters in honeybee populations.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Simulation studies to optimize genomic selection in honey bees.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Short-term effects of controlled mating and selection on the genetic variance of honeybee populations.Heredity · 2021Article
- A theoretical derivation of response to selection with and without controlled mating in honeybees.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundControlled mating procedures are widely accepted as a key aspect of successful breeding in almost all animal species. In honeybees, however, controlled mating is hard to achieve. Therefore, there have been several attempts to breed honeybees using free-mated queens. In such breeding schemes, selection occurs only on the maternal path since the drone sires are random samples of the population. The success rates of breeding approaches without controlled mating have so far not been investigated on a theoretical or simulation-based level.
methodsStochastic simulation studies were carried out to examine the chances of success in honeybee breeding with and without controlled mating. We investigated the influence of different sizes of breeding populations (500, 1000, 2000 colonies per year) and unselected passive populations (0, 500, 1000, 2000, infinitely many colonies per year) on selection for a maternally (queen) and directly (worker group) influenced trait with moderate ([Formula: see text]) or strong ([Formula: see text]) negative correlation between the two effects. The simulations described 20 years of selection.
resultsOur simulations showed a reduction of breeding success between 47 and 99% if mating was not controlled. In the most drastic cases, practically no genetic gain could be generated without controlled mating. We observed that in the trade-off between selection for direct or maternal effects, the absence of mating control leads to a shift in favor of maternal effects. Moreover, we describe the implications of different breeding strategies on the unselected passive population that benefits only indirectly via the transfer of queens or drones from the breeding population. We show that genetic gain in the passive population develops parallel to that of the breeding population. However, we found a genetic lag that became significantly smaller as more breeding queens served as dams of queens in the passive population.
conclusionsWe conclude that even when unwanted admixture of subspecies can be excluded in natural matings, controlled mating is imperative for successful breeding efforts. This is especially highlighted by the strong positive impact that controlled mating in the breeding population has on the unselected passive population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.