Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31830845›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019

Masked English Speech Recognition Performance in Younger and Older Spanish-English Bilingual and English Monolingual Children.

Margaret K Miller, Lauren Calandruccio, Emily Buss, Ryan W McCreery, Jacob Oleson, Barbara Rodriguez, Lori J Leibold

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of reverberation and binaural sensitivity on spatial release from masking.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Speech-in-speech recognition in preschoolers.International journal of audiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Margaret K MillerCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.
Lauren CalandruccioDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Emily BussDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Ryan W McCreeryCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.
Jacob OlesonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Barbara RodriguezDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Lori J LeiboldCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.

Funding

A TEST OF CHILDREN'S ENGLISH/SPANISH SPEECH PERCEPTION IN NOISE OR SPEECH MASKERSR01DC015056 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI BUSS, EMILY, LEIBOLD, LORI J. · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare masked English speech recognition thresholds between Spanish-English bilingual and English monolingual children and to evaluate effects of age, maternal education, and English receptive language abilities on individual differences in masked speech recognition. Method Forty-three Spanish-English bilingual children and 42 English monolingual children completed an English sentence recognition task in 2 masker conditions: (a) speech-shaped noise and (b) 2-talker English speech. Two age groups of children, younger (5-6 years) and older (9-10 years), were tested. The predictors of masked speech recognition performance were evaluated using 2 mixed-effects regression models. In the 1st model, fixed effects were age group (younger children vs. older children), language group (bilingual vs. monolingual), and masker type (speech-shaped noise vs. 2-talker speech). In the 2nd model, the fixed effects of receptive English vocabulary scores and maternal education level were also included. Results Younger children performed more poorly than older children, but no significant difference in masked speech recognition was observed between bilingual and monolingual children for either age group when English proficiency and maternal education were also included in the model. English language abilities fell within age-appropriate norms for both groups, but individual children with larger receptive vocabularies in English tended to show better recognition; this effect was stronger for younger children than for older children. Speech reception thresholds for all children were lower in the speech-shaped noise masker than in the 2-talker speech masker. Conclusions Regardless of age, similar masked speech recognition was observed for Spanish-English bilingual and English monolingual children tested in this study when receptive English language abilities were accounted for. Receptive English vocabulary scores were associated with better masked speech recognition performance for both bilinguals and monolinguals, with a stronger relationship observed for younger children than older children. Further investigation involving a Spanish-dominant bilingual sample is warranted given the high English language proficiency of children included in this study.

Indexed as

Age FactorsChild LanguageMultilingualismChildChild, PreschoolEducational StatusFemaleHumansIndividualityMalePerceptual MaskingRecognition, PsychologySpeech PerceptionVocabulary

Identifiers

PMID31830845
PMCPMC7839054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.