ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019
Masked English Speech Recognition Performance in Younger and Older Spanish-English Bilingual and English Monolingual Children.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.Ear and hearingTrial
- Development and Validation of Modified Basic English Lexicon Sentences for Use With a Pediatric Population.American journal of audiology · 2026Article
- The Effect of Diverse Linguistic Experience on Second Language-Accented English Sentence Recognition Among Monolingual and Spanish-English Bilingual Children and Adults.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Effects of reverberation and binaural sensitivity on spatial release from masking.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Home Language Experience Shapes Which Skills Are Used during Unfamiliar Speech Processing.Languages (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Speech-in-speech recognition in preschoolers.International journal of audiology · 2023Article
- Building on the Academic Legacy of Pat Stelmachowicz and other Pioneers in Developmental Psychoacoustics and Pediatric Audiology: The Children's English/Spanish Speech Recognition Test (ChEgSS).Seminars in hearing · 2023Review
- Masked-Speech Recognition for Linguistically Diverse Populations: A Focused Review and Suggestions for the Future.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Review
- Effects of word familiarity and receptive vocabulary size on speech-in-noise recognition among young adults with normal hearing.PloS one · 2022Article
- A Simplified Approach to Quantifying a Child's Bilingual Language Experience.American journal of audiology · 2021Article
- Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- The Involvement of Listening Effort in Explaining Bilingual Listening Under Adverse Listening Conditions.Trends in hearingReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare masked English speech recognition thresholds between Spanish-English bilingual and English monolingual children and to evaluate effects of age, maternal education, and English receptive language abilities on individual differences in masked speech recognition. Method Forty-three Spanish-English bilingual children and 42 English monolingual children completed an English sentence recognition task in 2 masker conditions: (a) speech-shaped noise and (b) 2-talker English speech. Two age groups of children, younger (5-6 years) and older (9-10 years), were tested. The predictors of masked speech recognition performance were evaluated using 2 mixed-effects regression models. In the 1st model, fixed effects were age group (younger children vs. older children), language group (bilingual vs. monolingual), and masker type (speech-shaped noise vs. 2-talker speech). In the 2nd model, the fixed effects of receptive English vocabulary scores and maternal education level were also included. Results Younger children performed more poorly than older children, but no significant difference in masked speech recognition was observed between bilingual and monolingual children for either age group when English proficiency and maternal education were also included in the model. English language abilities fell within age-appropriate norms for both groups, but individual children with larger receptive vocabularies in English tended to show better recognition; this effect was stronger for younger children than for older children. Speech reception thresholds for all children were lower in the speech-shaped noise masker than in the 2-talker speech masker. Conclusions Regardless of age, similar masked speech recognition was observed for Spanish-English bilingual and English monolingual children tested in this study when receptive English language abilities were accounted for. Receptive English vocabulary scores were associated with better masked speech recognition performance for both bilinguals and monolinguals, with a stronger relationship observed for younger children than older children. Further investigation involving a Spanish-dominant bilingual sample is warranted given the high English language proficiency of children included in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.