SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019
Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The 2023 WSES guidelines on the management of trauma in elderly and frail patients.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Guideline
- Prophylactic antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma: duration of use and antibiotic choice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Duodenal Trauma: Mechanisms of Injury, Diagnosis, and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Perioperative factors and outcomes associated with antimicrobial therapy duration in horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025Article
- Sepsis after trauma-evolving paradigms in stress biology and host response failure.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Antibacterial Antimicrobial Peptide Grafted HA/SF/Alg Wound Dressing Containing AIEgens for Infected Wound Treating.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic surgery for trans-anal barotrauma: a case report.World journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Successful surgical management of a combined abdominal and thoracic penetrating injury: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023Article
- Reduction of Surgical Site Infection After Trauma Laparotomy Through Use of a Specific Protocol for Antibiotic Prophylaxis.Surgical infections · 2023Article
- The combination of ciprofloxacin and indomethacin suppresses the level of inflammatory cytokines secreted by macrophages in vitro.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2022Article
- Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Torso, Maxillofacial, and Skin Traumatic Lesions: A Systematic Review of Recent Evidence.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Rare penetrating abdominal injury caused by falling from height: Miraculously good prognosis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- [Penetrating abdominal trauma].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPenetrating abdominal trauma occurs when the peritoneal cavity is breached. Routine laparotomy for penetrating abdominal injuries began in the 1800s, with antibiotics first being used in World War II to combat septic complications associated with these injuries. This practice was marked with a reduction in sepsis-related mortality and morbidity. Whether prophylactic antibiotics are required in the prevention of infective complications following penetrating abdominal trauma is controversial, however, as no randomised placebo controlled trials have been published to date. There has also been debate about the timing of antibiotic prophylaxis. In 1972 Fullen noted a 7% to 11% post-surgical infection rate with pre-operative antibiotics, a 33% to 57% infection rate with intra-operative antibiotic administration and 30% to 70% infection rate with only post-operative antibiotic administration. Current guidelines state there is sufficient class I evidence to support the use of a single pre-operative broad spectrum antibiotic dose, with aerobic and anaerobic cover, and continuation (up to 24 hours) only in the event of a hollow viscus perforation found at exploratory laparotomy.
objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of prophylactic antibiotics administered for penetrating abdominal injuries for the reduction of the incidence of septic complications, such as septicaemia, intra-abdominal abscesses and wound infections. SEARCH
methodsSearches were not restricted by date, language or publication status. We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2019, issue 7 of 12), MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), ISI Web of Science: Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science (CPCI-S) and PubMed. Searches were last conducted on 23 July 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma versus no antibiotics or placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors screened the literature search results independently. MAIN
resultsWe identified no trials meeting the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is currently no information from randomised controlled trials to support or refute the use of antibiotics for patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.