Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31830102›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Community perception of abortion, women who abort and abortifacients in Kisumu and Nairobi counties, Kenya.

Boniface Ayanbekongshie Ushie, Kenneth Juma, Grace Kimemia, Ramatou Ouedraogo, Martin Bangha, Michael Mutua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The support group impact on enhancing the self-worth of women who terminated a pregnancy in adolescence.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Boniface Ayanbekongshie UshieAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kenneth JumaAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-7742-9954
Grace KimemiaAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ramatou OuedraogoAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Martin BanghaAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Michael MutuaAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
African Population and Health Research Center · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbortion draws varied emotions based on individual and societal beliefs. Often, women known to have sought or those seeking abortion services experience stigma and social exclusion within their communities. Understanding community perception of abortion is critical in informing the design and delivery of interventions that reduce the gaps in access to safe abortion for women.

objectiveWe explored community perceptions and beliefs relating to abortion, clients of abortion services, and abortifacients in Kenya.

methodsWe conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) in Kisumu and Nairobi counties in Kenya among a mix of adult men and women, pharmacists, nurses, and community health volunteers.

resultsCommunity perspectives around abortion were heterogeneous, reflecting a myriad of opinions ranging from total anti-abortion to more pro-choice positions, and with rural-urban differences. Notably, negative views on abortion became more nuanced and tempered, especially among young women in urban areas, as details of factors that motivate women to seek abortion became apparent. Participants were mostly aware of the pathways through which women and girls access abortion services. Whereas abortion is commonplace, multiple structural and socioeconomic barriers, as well as stigma, are prevalent, thus impeding access to safe and quality services.

conclusionCommunity perceptions on abortion are heterogeneous, varying by gender, occupation, level of education, residence, and position in society. Stigma and the hostile abortion environment limit access to safe abortion services, with several negative consequences. There is urgent need to strengthen community-based approaches to mitigate predisposing and enabling factors for unsafe abortions.

Indexed as

Social StigmaAbortifacient AgentsAbortion, InducedAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansKenyaPerceptionPregnancyResidence CharacteristicsRural PopulationAbortifacient Agents

Identifiers

PMID31830102
PMCPMC6907763
OpenAlexW3013508968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.