Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31830067›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Direct comparison of retinal structure and function in retinitis pigmentosa by co-registering microperimetry and optical coherence tomography.

Jun Funatsu, Yusuke Murakami, Shunji Nakatake, Masato Akiyama, Kohta Fujiwara, Shotaro Shimokawa, Takashi Tachibana, Toshio Hisatomi, Yoshito Koyanagi, Yukihide Momozawa and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jun FunatsuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7418-1401
Yusuke MurakamiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shunji NakatakeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masato AkiyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kohta FujiwaraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shotaro ShimokawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takashi TachibanaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Toshio HisatomiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshito KoyanagiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yukihide MomozawaLaboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan.
Koh-Hei SonodaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yasuhiro IkedaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPFukuoka University · JPRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPUniversity of Miyazaki · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the retinal structure-function relationships in the macula of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients by comparing microperimetry-3 (MP-3) images with co-registered optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.

methodsThirty patients with typical RP were recruited from our hospital. The maculae of patients were examined with MP-3 and OCT. The retinal sensitivity was measured by MP-3 at 40 testing points arranged concentrically in a 16° diameter of the central retina, and we divided the 40 points into four zones according to degree from the fovea (2°, 4°, 6°, and 8°). We analyzed the correlation coefficients between the retinal sensitivity and the total retinal thickness (TRT), the length from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and between the retinal sensitivity and the outer retinal thickness (ORT), the length from the outer plexiform layer to the RPE at each stimulus point.

resultsTRT showed moderate correlations with the retinal sensitivity at 2° (median ρ = 0.59 interquartile range (IQR) [0.38-0.72]), 4° (ρ = 0.59 [0.55-0.68]) and 6° (ρ = 0.60 [0.54-0.63]), and TRT was weakly-to-moderately related to the retinal sensitivity at 8° (ρ = 0.27 [0.19-0.48]). ORT exhibited strong correlations at 2° (ρ = 0.72 [0.60-0.81]), 4° (ρ = 0.71 [0.75-0.67]) and 6° (ρ = 0.70 [0.54-0.74]), and a weak-to-moderate correlations at 8° (ρ = 0.34 [0.29-0.53]). ORT was more strongly correlated with the retinal sensitivity compared to TRT (p = 0.018).

conclusionORT, rather than TRT, within 6° eccentricity was strongly correlated with the retinal sensitivity, suggesting that measuring ORT in those areas will help evaluate the macular status and progression in RP.

Indexed as

Visual Field TestsAdultDisease ProgressionFemaleFundus OculiHumansMacula LuteaMaleMiddle AgedRetinaRetinal Pigment EpitheliumRetinitis PigmentosaStructure-Activity RelationshipTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID31830067
PMCPMC6907793
OpenAlexW2995900872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.