Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31829970›Full record

ArticleStatistical applications in genetics and molecular biology2019

Fast approximate inference for variable selection in Dirichlet process mixtures, with an application to pan-cancer proteomics.

Oliver M Crook, Laurent Gatto, Paul D W Kirk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oliver M CrookDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Laurent GattoUCLouvain, de Duve Institute, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1520-2268
Paul D W KirkMRC Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/10Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/13Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Dirichlet Process (DP) mixture model has become a popular choice for model-based clustering, largely because it allows the number of clusters to be inferred. The sequential updating and greedy search (SUGS) algorithm (Wang & Dunson, 2011) was proposed as a fast method for performing approximate Bayesian inference in DP mixture models, by posing clustering as a Bayesian model selection (BMS) problem and avoiding the use of computationally costly Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Here we consider how this approach may be extended to permit variable selection for clustering, and also demonstrate the benefits of Bayesian model averaging (BMA) in place of BMS. Through an array of simulation examples and well-studied examples from cancer transcriptomics, we show that our method performs competitively with the current state-of-the-art, while also offering computational benefits. We apply our approach to reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) in order to perform a pan-cancer proteomic characterisation of 5157 tumour samples. We have implemented our approach, together with the original SUGS algorithm, in an open-source R package named sugsvarsel, which accelerates analysis by performing intensive computations in C++ and provides automated parallel processing. The R package is freely available from: https://github.com/ococrook/sugsvarsel.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyModels, StatisticalProteomeProteomicsAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansNeoplasmsProteomeBayesian clusteringcancer proteomicsvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID31829970
PMCPMC7614016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.