Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31829450›Full record

ArticleCancer2020

Impact of performance status on treatment outcomes: A real-world study of advanced urothelial cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Ali Raza Khaki, Ang Li, Leonidas N Diamantopoulos, Mehmet A Bilen, Victor Santos, John Esther, Rafael Morales-Barrera, Michael Devitt, Ariel Nelson, Christopher J Hoimes and 27 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Anticancer therapy at end-of-life: A retrospective cohort study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Outcomes with atezolizumab in metastatic urothelial cancer: real-world data from a single institution.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Ali Raza KhakiDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-4655-4426
Ang LiDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-8455-2309
Leonidas N DiamantopoulosDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Mehmet A BilenDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-4003-1103
Victor SantosDepartment of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
John EstherDepartment of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Rafael Morales-BarreraVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Michael DevittDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Ariel NelsonDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Christopher J HoimesDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Evan ShreckDepartment of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Hussein AssiSection of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.ORCID 0000-0002-5487-9319
Benjamin A GartrellDepartment of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Alex SankinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Alejo Rodriguez-VidaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Mark LythgoeDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
David J PinatoDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3529-0103
Alexandra DrakakiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Monika JoshiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Pedro Isaacsson VelhoDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Noah HahnDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sandy LiuDivision of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Lucia Alonso BuznegoMarques de Valdecilla University Hospital, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Ignacio DuranMarques de Valdecilla University Hospital, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Marcus MosesDepartment of Medicine and Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Jayanshu JainDepartment of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Jure MurgicDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center, Sisters of Charity Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Praneeth BaratamCollege of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Pedro BarataDepartment of Medicine and Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Abhishek TripathiSection of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Yousef ZakhariaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Matthew D GalskyDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Guru SonpavdeGenitourinary Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Evan Y YuDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Veena ShankaranDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Gary H LymanDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Petros GrivasDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-3965-3394

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
TRAINING IN CANCER BIOLOGY &TRANSPLANTATIONT32CA009515 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NANCY ELLEN DAVIDSON, Effie W Petersdorf · 1985 to 2026
$16.2M
Cancer Research UKNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009515Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust PS3416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent an appealing treatment for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) and a poor performance status (PS). However, the benefit of ICIs for patients with a poor PS remains unknown. It was hypothesized that a poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS (≥2 vs 0-1) would correlate with shorter overall survival (OS) in patients receiving ICIs.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcome data were collected for patients with aUC who were treated with ICIs at 18 institutions (2013-2019). The overall response rate (ORR) and OS were compared for patients with an ECOG PS of 0 to 1 and patients with an ECOG PS ≥ 2 at ICI initiation. The association between a new ICI in the last 30 and 90 days of life (DOL) and death location was also tested.

resultsOf the 519 patients treated with ICIs, 395 and 384 were included in OS and ORR analyses, respectively, with 26% and 24% having a PS ≥ 2. OS was higher in those with a PS of 0 to 1 than those with a PS ≥ 2 who were treated in the first line (median, 15.2 vs 7.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P = .01) but not in subsequent lines (median, 9.8 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.78; P = .27). ORRs were similar for patients with a PS of 0 to 1 and patients with a PS ≥ 2 in both lines. Of the 288 patients who died, 10% and 32% started ICIs in the last 30 and 90 DOL, respectively. ICI initiation in the last 30 DOL was associated with increased odds of death in a hospital (odds ratio, 2.89; P = .04).

conclusionsDespite comparable ORRs, ICIs may not overcome the negative prognostic role of a poor PS, particularly in the first-line setting, and the initiation of ICIs in the last 30 DOL was associated with hospital death location.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAgedB7-H1 AntigenFemaleHumansImmunotherapyKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrologic NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptorbladder cancerimmunotherapyoutcomes researchperformance statusurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID31829450
PMCPMC7050422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.