Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31829271›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

A new methodology for sporogony research of avian haemoproteids in laboratory-reared Culicoides spp., with a description of the complete sporogonic development of Haemoproteus pastoris.

Dovilė Bukauskaitė, Carolina Romeiro Fernandes Chagas, Rasa Bernotienė, Rita Žiegytė, Mikas Ilgūnas, Tatjana Iezhova, Gediminas Valkiūnas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Insights into the Biology ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. First Report ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dovilė BukauskaitėNature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, 08412, Vilnius 21, Lithuania. dovilebu7@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4012-6738
Carolina Romeiro Fernandes ChagasNature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, 08412, Vilnius 21, Lithuania.
Rasa BernotienėNature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, 08412, Vilnius 21, Lithuania.
Rita ŽiegytėNature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, 08412, Vilnius 21, Lithuania.
Mikas IlgūnasNature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, 08412, Vilnius 21, Lithuania.
Tatjana IezhovaNature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, 08412, Vilnius 21, Lithuania.
Gediminas ValkiūnasNature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, 08412, Vilnius 21, Lithuania.
Nature Research Centre · LT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007039Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba DOTSUT-137-09.3.3-LMT-K-712-02-0004Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba S-MIP-17-27
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaemosporidian parasites of the genus Haemoproteus (Haemoproteidae) are widespread and cause haemoproteosis in birds and therefore, their diversity, ecology and evolutionary biology have become subjects of intensive research. However, the vectors and transmission patterns of haemoproteids as well as the epidemiology of haemoproteosis remain insufficiently investigated. Several species of Culicoides (Ceratopogonidae) support complete sporogony of haemoproteids belonging to the subgenus Parahaemoproteus. However, experimental research with these fragile insects is difficult to design in the field, particularly because their abundance markedly depends on seasonality. This is an obstacle for continuous sampling of sufficient numbers of naturally infected or experimentally exposed midges from wildlife. We developed simple methodology for accessing sporogonic development of haemoproteids in laboratory-reared Culicoides nubeculosus. This study aimed to describe the mosaic of methods constituting this methodology, which was applied for investigation of the sporogonic development of Haemoproteus (Parahaemoproteus) pastoris, a widespread parasite of the common starling Sturnus vulgaris.

methodsThe methodology consists of the following main stages: (i) laboratory rearing of C. nubeculosus from the egg stage to adult insects; (ii) selection of naturally infected birds, the donors of mature gametocytes to expose biting midges; (iii) experimental exposure of insects and their laboratory maintenance; and (iv) dissection of exposed insects. Biting midges were exposed to H. pastoris (cytochrome b lineage hLAMPUR01) detected in one naturally infected common starling. Engorged insects were dissected at intervals in order to follow sporogony. Microscopic examination and PCR-based methods were used to identify the sporogonic stages and to confirm the presence of the parasite lineage in infected insects, respectively.

resultsCulicoides nubeculosus females were successfully reared and exposed to H. pastoris, which completed sporogonic development 7-9 days post-infection when sporozoites were observed in the salivary glands.

conclusionsThe new methodology is easy to use and non-harmful for birds, providing opportunities to access the sporogonic stages of Parahaemoproteus parasites, which might be used in a broad range of parasitology and genetic studies. Culicoides nubeculosus is an excellent experimental vector of subgenus Parahaemoproteus and is recommended for various experimental studies aiming investigation of sporogony of these pathogens.

Indexed as

AnimalsBird DiseasesBirdsCeratopogonidaeHaemosporidaParasitologyProtozoan Infections, AnimalCulicoides nubeculosusHaemoproteusNew methodologySporogony

Identifiers

PMID31829271
PMCPMC6907249
OpenAlexW2996672698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.