Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31829232›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Aisha Shafayat, Emese Csipke, Lucy Bradshaw, Georgina Charlesworth, Florence Day, Phuong Leung, Esme Moniz-Cook, Alan A Montgomery, Steve Morris, Gail Mountain and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Aisha ShafayatNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Building 42, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. aisha.shafayat@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0412-381X
Emese CsipkeDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Lucy BradshawNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Building 42, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Georgina CharlesworthNorth East London NHS Foundation Trust, Goodmayes Hospital, 1st Floor, Maggie Lillie Suite, Ilford, IG3 8XJ, UK.
Florence DayNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Building 42, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Phuong LeungDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Esme Moniz-CookPsychology Ageing & Dementia Care Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Psychological Health, Wellbeing and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Alan A MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Building 42, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Steve MorrisDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Gail MountainFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.
Reuben OgollahNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Building 42, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Kirsty SprangeNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Building 42, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Lauren YatesDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Martin OrrellDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Room D07, Institute of Mental Health Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/L001802/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMemory services often see people with early stage dementia who are largely independent and able to participate in community activities but who run the risk of reducing activities and social networks. PRIDE is a self-management intervention designed to promote living well and enhance independence for people with mild dementia. This study aims to examine the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomised trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the PRIDE intervention offered in addition to usual care or with usual care alone. METHODS/

designPRIDE is a parallel, two-arm, multicentre, feasibility, randomised controlled trial (RCT). Eligible participants aged 18 or over who have mild dementia (defined as a score of 0.5 or 1 on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale) who can participate in the intervention and provide informed consent will be randomised (1:1) to treatment with the PRIDE intervention delivered in addition to usual care, or usual care only. Participants will be followed-up at 3 and 6 month's post-randomisation. There will be an option for a supporter to join each participant. Each supporter will be provided with questionnaires at baseline and follow-ups at 3 to 6 months. Embedded qualitative research with both participants and supporters will explore their perspectives on the intervention investigating a range of themes including acceptability and barriers and facilitators to delivery and participation. The feasibility of conducting a full RCT associated with participant recruitment and follow-up of both conditions, intervention delivery including the recruitment, training, retention of PRIDE trained facilitators, clinical outcomes, intervention and resource use costs and the acceptability of the intervention and study related procedures will be examined. DISCUSSION: This study will assess whether a definitive randomised trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of whether the PRIDE intervention offered in addition to usual care is feasible in comparison to usual care alone, and if so, will provide data to inform the design and conduct of a future trial.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN11288961, registered on 23 October 2019, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12345678 Protocol V2.1 dated 19 June 2019.

Indexed as

Independent LivingSelf CareCost-Benefit AnalysisDementiaEnglandFeasibility StudiesHealth Care CostsHealthy LifestyleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexSocial BehaviorTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeDementiaFeasibility trialSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID31829232
PMCPMC6907171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.