Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31829220›Full record

Trial reportBMC endocrine disorders2019

Effects of the Proactive interdisciplinary self-management (PRISMA) program on self-reported and clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Esther du Pon, Nanne Kleefstra, Frits Cleveringa, Ad van Dooren, Eibert R Heerdink, Sandra van Dulmen

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC endocrine disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Effects of patient education on the quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A scoping review.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Esther du PonResearch Group Process Innovations in Pharmaceutical Care, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 12011, 3501, AA, Utrecht, the Netherlands. estherdupon.hu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2728-3760
Nanne KleefstraMedical Research Group, Langerhans, Ommen, 7731, MX, the Netherlands.
Frits CleveringaJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584, CX, the Netherlands.
Ad van DoorenResearch Group Process Innovations in Pharmaceutical Care, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 12011, 3501, AA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Eibert R HeerdinkResearch Group Process Innovations in Pharmaceutical Care, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 12011, 3501, AA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Sandra van DulmenNivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, 3513, CR, the Netherlands.
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes self-management education can be helpful for patients with type 2 diabetes in managing their condition. We aimed to study the effects of the group-based PRoactive Interdisciplinary Self-MAnagement (PRISMA) training program on self-reported and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes treated in general practice.

methodsPersons aged 18 years or older diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and treated in primary care were included. In a randomized controlled trial design (1:1), patients were followed for 6 months with an extension phase of 6 months. Block randomization was used. The patients with type 2 diabetes received either PRISMA in addition to usual care or usual care only. All patients completed a range of validated questionnaires (including knowledge, skills, and confidence for self-management [PAM], diabetes self-care behavior [SDSCA], health-related quality of life [EQ-5D], and emotional well-being [WHO-5]). In addition, clinical outcomes (HbA1c, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and cholesterol levels) were collected during the routine diabetes checkups.

resultsOf the total sample (n = 193), 60.1% were men. The mean age was 69.9 years (SD = 9.1). No significant differences were found on self-reported outcomes between the groups at 0, 6, and 12 months. The clinical outcomes were not reported due to a large number of missing values.

conclusionPRISMA did not improve self-reported outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes treated in primary care. It was not possible to make a statement about the clinical effects.

trial registrationdate: 16/07/2014, number: NL4550 (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/4550).

Indexed as

Self ReportAgedBody Mass IndexDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGeneral PracticeGlycated HemoglobinHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationQuality of LifeGlycated HemoglobinE-healthGroup educationPrimary careSelf-managementType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31829220
PMCPMC6907250
OpenAlexW2996524289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.