Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31829182›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2019

Analysis of disease comorbidity patterns in a large-scale China population.

Mengfei Guo, Yanan Yu, Tiancai Wen, Xiaoping Zhang, Baoyan Liu, Jin Zhang, Runshun Zhang, Yanning Zhang, Xuezhong Zhou

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Simplicity within biological complexity.Bioinformatics advances · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Visual Phenotype-Based Differential Diagnosis Process for Rare Diseases.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mengfei GuoSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China.
Yanan YuSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China.
Tiancai WenInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Xiaoping ZhangChina Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing, 100070, China.
Baoyan LiuChina Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing, 100070, China. liuby@mail.cintcm.ac.cn.
Jin ZhangData Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Runshun ZhangChina Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guang'anmen Hospital, Beijing, 100053, China.
Yanning ZhangSchool of Computer Science, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710129, Shanxi Province, China. ynzhang@nwpu.edu.cn.
Xuezhong ZhouSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China. xzzhou@bjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisease comorbidity is popular and has significant indications for disease progress and management. We aim to detect the general disease comorbidity patterns in Chinese populations using a large-scale clinical data set.

methodsWe extracted the diseases from a large-scale anonymized data set derived from 8,572,137 inpatients in 453 hospitals across China. We built a Disease Comorbidity Network (DCN) using correlation analysis and detected the topological patterns of disease comorbidity using both complex network and data mining methods. The comorbidity patterns were further validated by shared molecular mechanisms using disease-gene associations and pathways. To predict the disease occurrence during the whole disease progressions, we applied four machine learning methods to model the disease trajectories of patients.

resultsWe obtained the DCN with 5702 nodes and 258,535 edges, which shows a power law distribution of the degree and weight. It further indicated that there exists high heterogeneity of comorbidities for different diseases and we found that the DCN is a hierarchical modular network with community structures, which have both homogeneous and heterogeneous disease categories. Furthermore, adhering to the previous work from US and Europe populations, we found that the disease comorbidities have their shared underlying molecular mechanisms. Furthermore, take hypertension and psychiatric disease as instance, we used four classification methods to predicte the disease occurrence using the comorbid disease trajectories and obtained acceptable performance, in which in particular, random forest obtained an overall best performance (with F1-score 0.6689 for hypertension and 0.6802 for psychiatric disease).

conclusionsOur study indicates that disease comorbidity is significant and valuable to understand the disease incidences and their interactions in real-world populations, which will provide important insights for detection of the patterns of disease classification, diagnosis and prognosis.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsChinaComorbidityData MiningGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansHypertensionMental DisordersModels, TheoreticalPrognosisComplex networkDisease comorbidityNetwork medicine

Identifiers

PMID31829182
PMCPMC6907122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.