Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31829174›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

The content of patient counseling about interchangeable medicines and generic substitution in Finnish community pharmacies - a survey of dispensers.

Riikka Rainio, Riitta Ahonen, Johanna Timonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Riikka RainioSchool of Pharmacy/ Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kuopio Campus, University of Eastern Finland, Box 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, PO, Finland. riikka.rainio@uef.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-1777
Riitta AhonenSchool of Pharmacy/ Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kuopio Campus, University of Eastern Finland, Box 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, PO, Finland.
Johanna TimonenSchool of Pharmacy/ Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kuopio Campus, University of Eastern Finland, Box 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, PO, Finland.

Funding

The Social Insurance Institution of Finland 3/26/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneric substitution aims to increase the use of more affordable generic preparations and restrain the growth of medicine expenditures. Pharmaceutical staff plays an important role in generic substitution by implementing substitution and counseling customers. The aim of this study was to explore how Finnish dispensers inform pharmacy customers about interchangeable medicines and generic substitution and what customers ask dispensers about generic substitution and the reference price system.

methodsA questionnaire was sent to a random sample of dispensers (n = 1054) working in community pharmacies in spring 2018. The data was analyzed using frequencies, percentages and the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. The open-ended questions were analyzed first using inductive content analysis and later with the quantitative methods mentioned above.

resultsThe final study material consisted of 498 questionnaires (response rate 51%). The main topics dispensers always informed customers about were the physician's record in the prescription not to substitute the medicine (69%) and that the prescribed or purchased interchangeable medicine did not belong in the reference price band (59%). Topics mentioned often by dispensers dealt with customer's chance to choose their medicine from among several alternative products (68%) and the manufacturer of the interchangeable medicines (66%). Differences in appearance (33%) or in composition (28%) of interchangeable products were the most common topics mentioned only when the customer asked about them. Of the respondents 17.6% always and 51.4% often informed the customer about the least expensive interchangeable product at the point of dispensing. Customers' questions about the generic substitution and reference price system most commonly (82.4%) concerned the similarity of interchangeable medicines.

conclusionsFinnish dispensers provide customers with a wide range of information about different subjects when dispensing interchangeable medicines. Patient counseling generally meets the legislative requirements, except for price counseling. In future, information about generic substitution and interchangeable medicines should continuously be provided to customers both at pharmacies and elsewhere, e.g. through educational campaigns.

Indexed as

PharmaciesProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultCounselingDrugs, GenericFemaleFinlandHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesDrugs, GenericCommunity pharmacyGeneric substitutionInterchangeable medicinesPatient counselingReference price systemSurvey

Identifiers

PMID31829174
PMCPMC6907127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.