Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31829171›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2019

Antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage.

I Holmer, C M Salomonsen, S E Jorsal, L B Astrup, V F Jensen, B Borck Høg, K Pedersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  7. Antimicrobial resistance profiling ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  10. ISAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

I HolmerTechnical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet Building 202, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
C M SalomonsenSEGES, Agro Food Park 15, DK-8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
S E JorsalTechnical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet Building 202, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
L B AstrupTechnical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet Building 202, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
V F JensenTechnical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet Building 202, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
B Borck HøgTechnical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet Building 202, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
K PedersenNational Veterinary Institute, Ulls väg 2B, 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden. karl.pedersen@sva.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5013-7409
Technical University of Denmark · DKKnowledge Centre for Agriculture · DKSwedish Veterinary Agency · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal treatment and prudent use of antimicrobials for pigs is imperative to secure animal health and prevent development of critical resistance. An important step in this one-health context is to monitor resistance patterns of important animal pathogens. The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial resistance patterns of five major pathogens in Danish pigs during a period from 2004 to 2017 and elucidate any developments or associations between resistance and usage of antibiotics.

resultsThe minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for Escherichia coli, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Streptococcus suis, Bordetella bronchiseptica, and Staphylococcus hyicus was determined to representatives of antibiotic classes relevant for treatment or surveillance. Escherichia coli isolates were mostly sensitive to fluoroquinolones and colistin, whereas high levels of resistance were observed to ampicillin, spectinomycin, streptomycin, sulfonamides and tetracycline. While resistance levels to most compounds remained relatively stable during the period, resistance to florfenicol increased from 2.1% in 2004 to 18.1% in 2017, likely in response to a concurrent increase in usage. A temporal association between resistance and usage was also observed for neomycin. E. coli serovars O138 and O149 were generally more resistant than O139. For A. pleuropneumoniae, the resistance pattern was homogenous and predictable throughout the study period, displaying high MIC values only to erythromycin whereas almost all isolates were susceptible to all other compounds. Most S. suis isolates were sensitive to penicillin whereas high resistance levels to erythromycin and tetracycline were recorded, and resistance to erythromycin and trimethoprim increasing over time. For S. hyicus, sensitivity to the majority of the antimicrobials tested was observed. However, penicillin resistance was recorded in 69.4-88.9% of the isolates. All B. bronchiseptica isolates were resistant to ampicillin, whereas all but two isolates were sensitive to florfenicol. The data obtained have served as background for a recent formulation of evidence-based treatment guidelines for pigs.

conclusionsAntibiotic resistance varied for some pathogens over time and in response to usage. Resistance to critically important compounds was low. The results emphasize the need for continuous surveillance of resistance patterns also in pig pathogenic bacteria.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsDenmarkMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSwineSwine DiseasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsActinobacillus pleuropneumoniaeAntimicrobial resistanceE. coliPigStaphylococcus hyicusStreptococcus suis

Identifiers

PMID31829171
PMCPMC6907208
OpenAlexW2995172446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.