Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31829114›Full record

ReviewGlobal health action2019

Accompanimeter 1.0: creation and initial field testing of a tool to assess the extent to which the principles and building blocks of accompaniment are present in community health worker programs.

Hector Carrasco, Harriet Napier, David Giber, Stephanie Kang, Mercedes Aguerreberre, Matthew Hing, Vinicius Siqueira Tavares Meira Silva, Mariana Montaño, Henry Perry, Daniel Palazuelos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global health action, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Engaging with peers to integrate community care: Knowledge synthesis and conceptual map.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hector CarrascoDoctor of Public Health Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5657-5821
Harriet NapierDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8788-6796
David GiberCommunity Health Systems, Partners In Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Stephanie KangDoctor of Public Health Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Mercedes AguerreberreDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5951-4047
Matthew HingDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Vinicius Siqueira Tavares Meira SilvaFamily Medicine, Maria do Socorro Silva e Souza Family Clinic, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5349-2879
Mariana MontañoDepartment of Maternal Health, Partners In Health (Compañeros En Salud), Ángel Albino Corzo, Chis, México.
Henry PerryDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0561-0492
Daniel PalazuelosCommunity Health Systems, Partners In Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3701-0707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareProgram DevelopmentQuality ImprovementCommunity health workersPartners In Healthprimary health carequality improvementthe Accompanimeter 1.0

Identifiers

PMID31829114
PMCPMC6913655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.