Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31828787›Full record

ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2020

Retrospective evaluation of the Dutch pre-newborn screening cohort for propionic acidemia and isolated methylmalonic acidemia: What to aim, expect, and evaluate from newborn screening?

Hanneke A Haijes, Femke Molema, Mirjam Langeveld, Mirian C Janssen, Annet M Bosch, Francjan van Spronsen, Margot F Mulder, Nanda M Verhoeven-Duif, Judith J M Jans, Ans T van der Ploeg and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Propionic acidemia in Mexico: Clinical and genotypic spectrum.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Natural history of propionic acidemia in the Amish population.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient with propionic acidemia.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Hanneke A HaijesSection Metabolic Diagnostics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Femke MolemaDepartment of Pediatrics, Center for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mirjam LangeveldDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mirian C JanssenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Annet M BoschDepartment of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Francjan van SpronsenDivision of Metabolic Diseases, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Margot F MulderDepartment of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nanda M Verhoeven-DuifSection Metabolic Diagnostics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Judith J M JansSection Metabolic Diagnostics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ans T van der PloegDepartment of Pediatrics, Center for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Margreet A WagenmakersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M Estela Rubio-GozalboDepartment of Pediatrics and Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Martijn C G J BrouwersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolic Disease, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maaike C de VriesDepartment of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Janneke G LangendonkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique WilliamsDepartment of Pediatrics, Center for Lysosomal and Metabolic Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter M van HasseltSection Metabolic Diseases, Department of Child Health, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLMaastricht University · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence for effectiveness of newborn screening (NBS) for propionic acidemia (PA) and isolated methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) is scarce. Prior to implementation in the Netherlands, we aim to estimate the expected health gain of NBS for PA and MMA. In this national retrospective cohort study, the clinical course of 76/83 Dutch PA and MMA patients, diagnosed between January 1979 and July 2019, was evaluated. Five clinical outcome parameters were defined: adverse outcome of the first symptomatic phase, frequency of acute metabolic decompensations (AMD), cognitive function, mitochondrial complications, and treatment-related complications. Outcomes of patients identified by family testing were compared with the outcomes of their index siblings. An adverse outcome due to the first symptomatic phase was recorded in 46% of the clinically diagnosed patients. Outcome of the first symptomatic phase was similar in 5/9 sibling pairs and better in 4/9 pairs. Based on the day of diagnosis of the clinically diagnosed patients and sibling pair analysis, a preliminary estimated reduction of adverse outcome due to the first symptomatic phase from 46% to 36%-38% was calculated. Among the sibling pairs, AMD frequency, cognitive function, mitochondrial, and treatment-related complications were comparable. These results suggest that the health gain of NBS for PA and MMA in overall outcome may be limited, as only a modest decrease of adverse outcomes due to the first symptomatic phase is expected. With current clinical practice, no reduced AMD frequency, improved cognitive function, or reduced frequency of mitochondrial or treatment-related complications can be expected.

Indexed as

Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn ErrorsCognitionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMethylmalonic AcidMitochondrial DiseasesNeonatal ScreeningNetherlandsPropionic AcidemiaRetrospective StudiesSiblingsMethylmalonic Acidmethylmalonic acidemiaMMANBSnewborn screeningPApropionic acidemia

Identifiers

PMID31828787
PMCPMC7317354
OpenAlexW2995272054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.