Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31828701›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Serum analysis in women and in vitro skin assay for the assessment of exposure to parabens in antiperspirants.

Isarita Martins, Mayara Lambert, Ana Flávia Souza Pereira, Henrique Dipe de Faria, Elizabete Campos de Lima, Gislaine Ribeiro Pereira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isarita MartinsLaboratory of Toxicants and Drug Analyses, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Gabriel Monteiro Street, 700, Alfenas, 37130-000, Brazil. isarita.sakakibara@unifal-mg.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7471-3773
Mayara LambertLaboratory of Toxicants and Drug Analyses, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Gabriel Monteiro Street, 700, Alfenas, 37130-000, Brazil.
Ana Flávia Souza PereiraLaboratory of Toxicants and Drug Analyses, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Gabriel Monteiro Street, 700, Alfenas, 37130-000, Brazil.
Henrique Dipe de FariaLaboratory of Toxicants and Drug Analyses, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Gabriel Monteiro Street, 700, Alfenas, 37130-000, Brazil.
Elizabete Campos de LimaCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC, Santo André, Brazil.
Gislaine Ribeiro PereiraLaboratory of Liberation Systems, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study assessed the exposure to methylparaben (MP) and propylparaben (PP) from antiperspirants in serum of 24 women aged 20-30 years old and an in vitro skin assay. An effective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of MP and PP levels in serum was developed and validated in the range of 10-100 μg/L; the method was fast, simple, sensitive, linear, precise, and accurate. In addition, a simple and rapid liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection method for the determination of MP and PP levels in antiperspirants was developed and validated in the range of 2-26 mg/L, which presented satisfactory linearity, precision, and accuracy. Using these two methods, 20 commercial antiperspirants were evaluated, and only three showed MP and PP in the formulation. The antiperspirant containing 0.2% and 0.1% w/w MP and PP, respectively, was given to the volunteers, to estimate the internal dose, and submitted to a pig ear skin permeation assay in Franz diffusion cells, presenting a permeation flux of 32% for MP and 71% for PP. In this assay, both MP and PP permeated the skin; however, there was no correlation between antiperspirant use and paraben serum concentration in the volunteers. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

SkinSkin AbsorptionAdultAnimalsAntiperspirantsChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansParabensSerumSwineYoung AdultAntiperspirantsParabensAntiperspirantsExposure assessmentParabensToxicology of cosmetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.