ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020
Predictors of nasal bacterial culture rates in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Bacteriology Between Geriatric and Adult Rhinosinusitis with and Without NPs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of Fungal and Non-Fungal Rhinosinusitis by Culture-Based Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Sinonasal Outcomes Using Oral Corticosteroids in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Positive Sinonasal Cultures.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2023Article
- The effect of topical ocular moxifloxacin on conjunctival and nasal mucosal flora.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All nontechnical factors were analyzed to predict nasal bacterial culture results in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Four hundred and ninety-six CRS patients, who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), were enrolled. Prior to FESS, the severity of each patient's CRS was evaluated using a questionnaire, endoscopic examination, acoustic rhinometry, smell test, saccharine transit test, and CT scan. Nasal bacterial cultures were collected from both middle meati using a cotton-tipped stick. Our results showed that the symptom severity complained of by patients and their loss of smell function did not influence the bacterial culture rate. We discovered that the bacterial culture rate was significantly higher in nostrils with nasal polyps than those without polyps, along with nostrils experiencing thick, purulent discharge as opposed to those without discharge. Additionally, this result also occurred in nostrils with a saccharin transit time of more than 30 min than it did in those with a saccharin transit time of less than or equal to 30 min. Both the total endoscopic score and anterior group CT score were significantly higher in nostrils with positive culture than those with negative culture, while the second minimal cross-sectional area (MCA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.