ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2019
The Evolving Role of Electrocardiography in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrocardiographic Correlates of Myocardial Remodeling After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2026Article
- Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Implantation.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025Article
- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Situs Inversus Totalis and Congenitally Corrected Transposition of Great Arteries.JACC. Case reports · 2024Article
- Different methods of 3D QRS area calculation from vectorcardiographic X, Y, and Z Leads.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2024Article
- Feasibility study on cardiac resynchronization in the treatment of heart failure by single left bundle branch pacing.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Electrocardiographic prediction of left ventricular hypertrophy in women and men with left bundle branch block - Comparison of QRS duration, amplitude and voltage-time-integral.Journal of electrocardiologyArticle
- QRS 3D voltage-time integral in narrow QRS complex - Establishing the normal reference range.Journal of electrocardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis study aims to summarize the literature on the role of electrocardiography (ECG) in (i) patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), (ii) predicting clinical response after CRT system is implanted, and (iii) optimizing CRT programming. RECENT
findingsProgress has been made in interpreting ECG beyond QRS duration and left bundle branch (LBBB) morphology to select patients for CRT. We now understand a higher chance of response to CRT in patients with atypical right bundle branch block and lower response rates in subgroups with atypical LBBB. QRS area has emerged as a novel marker to quantify baseline electrical dyssynchrony to improve patient selection. After CRT, the resultant QRS narrowing remains the most validated predictor of long-term favorable outcome. There is increasing awareness of prolonged left ventricular pacing latency hindering the desired response to CRT. There is active interest in using ECG beyond minimizing QRS duration to optimize CRT programming for maximal resynchronization. Novel strategies include fusion of paced and/or conducted wavefronts and minimization of paced QRS area. ECG remains the ubiquitous method for ventricular electrical mapping in context of CRT. The role of ECG in elucidating baseline electrical dyssynchrony to aptly select patients for this treatment continues to evolve, and ECG is increasingly being evaluated as a reliable endpoint for optimal CRT programming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.