ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2020
Strain analysis reveals subtle systolic dysfunction in confirmed and suspected myocarditis with normal LVEF. A cardiac magnetic resonance study.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance atrial and ventricular strain for adverse prognosis in patients with myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Advances in cardiac ultrasound speckle tracking technology for assessing left ventricular systolic function after adjuvant radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.American journal of translational research · 2025Review
- Unveiling the Diagnostic Value of Strain Parameters Across All 4 Cardiac Chambers in Patients With Acute Myocarditis With Varied Ejection Fraction: A Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature-Tracking Approach.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Comparative Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Based Feature Tracking and Deep-Learning Strain Assessment in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocarditis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical application of CMR in cardiomyopathies: evolving concepts and techniques : A position paper of myocardial and pericardial diseases and cardiac magnetic resonance working groups of Italian society of cardiology.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- State-of-the-art myocardial strain by CMR feature tracking: clinical applications and future perspectives.European radiology · 2022Review
- The Arrhythmic Phenotype in Cardiomyopathy.Heart failure clinics · 2022Review
- Arrhythmic risk stratification by cardiac magnetic resonance tissue characterization: disclosing the arrhythmic substrate within the heart muscle.Heart failure reviews · 2022Review
- Article
- Re-introducing immunotherapy in patients surviving immune checkpoint inhibitors-mediated myocarditis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsLake Louise Criteria (LLC) are time-dependent and some acute myocarditis (AM) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) could be missed, due to the limited accessibility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR). We aimed to assess the potential value of cardiac strain measured by feature tracking (FT) imaging in this population. METHODS AND
resultsEighty-three patients with clinically suspected AM and normal LVEF were divided into 39 "confirmed AM" (positive LLC) and 44 "suspected AM" (negative LLC). An age and gender-matched sample of 42 normal subjects underwent CMR. In all groups, FT-derived biventricular strains and STE- global longitudinal strain (GLS) were assessed, being regularly measurable. Strain values < 5th percentile of the control group were considered abnormal. "Suspected" and "confirmed" AM were similar, except for medium time of CMR evaluation (5.2 vs 1 months from presentation, respectively; p = 0.004). Compared to healthy controls, both "suspected" and "confirmed" AM showed significantly impaired strain values. LV-global circumferential strain (GCS), right ventricular GCS and LV-GLS were abnormal in 15.4% and 15.9%, 20.5% and 15.9%, 7.7% and 9.1% in "confirmed" and "suspected" AM, respectively. STE analysis confirmed the results on LV-GLS, however a weak correlation emerged between STE and CMR-FT LV-GLS (p = 0.08).
conclusionsCompared to STE, CMR-FT analysis provided a more comprehensive and complementary biventricular strain evaluation that resulted similar in "confirmed" and "suspected" AM with normal LVEF. Conversely, mostly biventricular GCS was significantly reduced in up to 20% of patients, compared to healthy controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31828505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.