Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31828498›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Laparoscopic versus open limited liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study with the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO).

Masateru Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Kobayashi, Akihiko Oshita, Tomoyuki Abe, Toshihiko Kohashi, Takashi Onoe, Saburo Fukuda, Ichiro Omori, Yasuhiro Imaoka, Naruhiko Honmyo and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy of Laparoscopic HepatectomyFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension on minimally invasive limited liver resection for primary liver malignancies in the posterosuperior segments: An international multicenter study.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Masateru YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami Ward, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Tsuyoshi KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami Ward, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. tsukoba@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Akihiko OshitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakanda, Minami Ward, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan.
Tomoyuki AbeDepartment of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, 1-10-23 Hirahara, Onomichi, 722-8508, Japan.
Toshihiko KohashiDepartment of Surgery, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, 2-1-1 Kabeminami, Asakita Ward, Hiroshima, 731-0293, Japan.
Takashi OnoeNational Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center/Chugoku Cancer Center, Institute for Clinical Research, 3-1, Aoyamacho, Kure, Hiroshima, 737-0023, Japan.
Saburo FukudaDepartment of Surgery, Chugoku Rosai Hospital, 1-5-1 Hirotagaya, Kure, 737-0193, Japan.
Ichiro OmoriDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Higashihiroshima Medical Center, 513, Jike, Saijyo-cho, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima, 739-0041, Japan.
Yasuhiro ImaokaDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hiroshima-Nishi Medical Center, 4-1-1 Kuba, Otake, Hiroshima, 739-0696, Japan.
Naruhiko HonmyoDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami Ward, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Hideki OhdanDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami Ward, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Hiroshima University Hospital · JPChugoku Rosai Hospital · JPHigashihiroshima Medical Center · JPHiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital · JPHiroshima Prefectural Hospital · JPKure Medical Center · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPOnomichi General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has evolved as a safe and effective alternative to conventional open liver resection (OLR) for malignant lesions. However, LLR in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. This study analyzed the perioperative and oncological outcomes of LLR for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with cirrhosis compared with OLR using propensity score matching.

methodsA multicenter retrospective analysis of records of patients who underwent limited liver resection for HCC and were histologically diagnosed with liver cirrhosis between January 2009 and December 2017 in the eight institutions belonging to the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: the LLR and OLR groups. After propensity score matching, we compared clinicopathological features and outcomes.

resultsIn total 256 patients with histological liver cirrhosis who underwent limited liver resection for HCC were included in this study; 58 patients had undergone LLR, and the remaining 198 patients OLR. The number of tumors was higher, tumor size was larger, and difficulty score was significantly higher in the OLR group before propensity matching. After the matching, the data of the well-matched 58 patients in each group were evaluated; the intraoperative blood loss was lower in the LLR group (p = 0.004), and incidence of the postoperative complications was significantly higher in the OLR group (p = 0.019). The duration of the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LLR group (p < 0.001). There were no differences between two groups in overall survival and recurrent-free survival.

conclusionsLLR decreased the incidences of postoperative complications, shortened the duration of postoperative hospital stay. Thus, LLR is a safe and feasible procedure even in patients with cirrhosis.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHepatectomyHumansIncidenceJapanLaparoscopyLength of StayLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedHepatocellular carcinomaLaparoscopic liver resectionLimited liver resectionLiver cirrhosisMulticenter studyPropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID31828498
OpenAlexW2995797322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.