Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31828494›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Investigating relationships among cancer survivors' engagement in an online support community, social support perceptions, well-being, and moderating effects of existing (offline) social support.

J Lee Westmaas, Elizabeth Fallon, Bennett R McDonald, Deborah Driscoll, Kristi Richardson, Kenneth Portier, Tenbroeck Smith

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparing the roles of social context, networks, and perceived social functioning with health-related quality of life among self-reported rural female cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J Lee WestmaasAmerican Cancer Society, 250 Williams St. NW, Atlanta, 30303, Georgia. lee.westmaas@cancer.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6716-7695
Elizabeth FallonAmerican Cancer Society, 250 Williams St. NW, Atlanta, 30303, Georgia.
Bennett R McDonaldAmerican Cancer Society, 250 Williams St. NW, Atlanta, 30303, Georgia.
Deborah DriscollAmerican Cancer Society, 250 Williams St. NW, Atlanta, 30303, Georgia.
Kristi RichardsonAmerican Cancer Society, 250 Williams St. NW, Atlanta, 30303, Georgia.
Kenneth PortierAmerican Cancer Society, 250 Williams St. NW, Atlanta, 30303, Georgia.
Tenbroeck SmithAmerican Cancer Society, 250 Williams St. NW, Atlanta, 30303, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSocially supportive relationships help cancer survivors cope with their diagnosis and may improve quality of life; however, many survivors report unmet support and information needs. Online communities of survivors may address these needs, but research on their benefits have been equivocal. This cross-sectional, self-report study investigated relationships among cancer survivors' level of engagement in an online survivor community (The American Cancer Society Cancer Survivors Network®; CSN), perceptions of emotional/informational support available from online communities ("online social support"), well-being, and moderating effects of "offline social support."

methodsParticipants were 1255 registered users of the CSN who completed surveys between 2013 and 2014. Three types of engagement with the CSN-social/communal, interpersonal communication, and informational/search engagement-were identified through principal components analysis. Regression analyses examined hypotheses.

resultsMore frequent social/communal and interpersonal communication engagement were associated with increased online social support (p < .0001), and the relationship between interpersonal communication engagement and online social support was strongest for survivors reporting lower offline social support (interaction β = - .35, p < .001). Greater online social support was associated with increased well-being, but only among survivors reporting low offline social support (interaction β = - .35, p < .0001).

conclusionsEngagement in online survivor communities may increase support perceptions that promote well-being, but benefits may accrue more to survivors reporting low offline social support. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Newly diagnosed cancer survivors, particularly those with unmet emotional/informational support needs, should be given the opportunity to communicate with other survivors through online survivor support networks.

Indexed as

Social PerceptionSocial SupportCancer SurvivorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer survivorInternetOnline health communityQuality of lifeSocial networkingSocial support

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.