Observational studyJournal of neurology2020
Cognitive dysfunction and brain atrophy in Susac syndrome.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01481662 (Epidemiological, Clinical and Etiological Features of SUSAC's Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Epidemiological, Clinical and Etiological Features of SUSAC's Syndrome (RETINOCOCHLEOCEREBRAL Vasculopathy)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brain microstructural damage through serial diffusion tensor imaging and outcomes in Susac syndrome: A prospective cohort study.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- The neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric manifestations of Susac syndrome: a brief review of the literature and future directions.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Review
- Cognitive outcomes in Susac syndrome: A 2-year neuropsychological follow-up study.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Susac syndrome: neurological update (clinical features, long-term observational follow-up and management of sixteen patients).Journal of neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSusac syndrome is a very rare cerebral small vessel disease, which can leave patients with cognitive impairment. We aimed at evaluating processing speed slowing, executive dysfunction and apathy and their relationships with whole brain and callosal atrophy.
methodsPatients with Susac syndrome included in a prospective observational cohort study were evaluated, while clinically steady-state, with standardized brain MRI and a neuropsychological battery specifically designed to capture minimal cognitive alterations in non-disabled young patients. Brain volume and corpus callosum area were measured using 3D-T1 sequences, repeatedly overtime. Relationships between neuropsychological data and brain volumetric measures obtained the same day were tested with linear regression while controlling for sex, age, level of education, scores of depression and of apathy.
resultsNineteen patients aged 37.5 ± 10.5 years were included. Mean follow-up time was 2.6 ± 1.3 years (5.8 ± 2.2 evaluations). While Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were 25.1 ± 3.6, processing speed slowing was obvious (Trail Making Test version A: 43.1 ± 16.2 s; version B: 95.5 ± 67.9 s; reaction time: 314.6 ± 79.6 ms). Brain and corpus callosum atrophy was striking. No relationship was found between cognitive performances and brain volume or corpus callosum area.
conclusionPatients with Susac syndrome show largely preserved global cognitive functions but important processing speed alterations. Although brain and corpus callosum area atrophy is prominent and evolving, we did not find any relationship with cognitive alterations, questioning the mechanisms underlying cognitive alterations in these patients.
trial registrationClinical Trial Registration-URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT01481662.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.