Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31828405›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020

Assessing patients' preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provider.

Tanya P Hoke, Alexander A Berger, Christine C Pan, Lindsey A Jackson, William D Winkelman, Rachel High, Katherine A Volpe, Chee Paul Lin, Holly E Richter

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Women in spine surgery: can we change the society?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tanya P HokeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic, Reconstructive Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, WIC Suite 10382, 619 19th Street South, 176F, Birmingham, AL, 35249-7333, USA. tanyahokemd@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0050-4711
Alexander A BergerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Kaiser San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Christine C PanDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Lindsey A JacksonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
William D WinkelmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Rachel HighTexas A & M Health Science Center, Temple, TX, USA.
Katherine A VolpeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Chee Paul LinCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Holly E RichterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic, Reconstructive Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, WIC Suite 10382, 619 19th Street South, 176F, Birmingham, AL, 35249-7333, USA.

Funding

National Dissemination of I-Corps@NCATS: Accelerating Translation through CommercializationUL1TR003096 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GUTIERREZ, ORLANDO M, KIMBERLY, ROBERT P. · 2019 to 2023
$43.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003096NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR003096Society of Gynecologic Surgeons (US) Fellows' Pelvic Research Network Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisUnderstanding patient preferences regarding provider characteristics is an under-explored area in urogynecology. This study aims to describe patient preferences for urogynecologic care, including provider gender, age, experience, and presence of medical trainees.

methodsThis was a multicenter, cross-sectional, survey-based study assessing patient preferences with a voluntary, self-administered, anonymous questionnaire prior to their first urogynecology consult. A 5-point Likert scale addressing provider gender, age, experience, and presence of trainees was used. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics and provider preferences. Chi-squared (or Fisher's exact) test was used to test for associations.

resultsSix hundred fifteen women participated from eight sites including all geographic regions across the US; 70.8% identified as white with mean age of 58.5 ± 14.2 years. Urinary incontinence was the most commonly reported symptom (45.9%); 51.4% saw a female provider. The majority of patients saw a provider 45-60 years old (42.8%) with > 15 years' experience (60.9%). Sixty-five percent of patients preferred a female provider; 10% preferred a male provider. Sixteen percent preferred a provider < 45 years old, 36% preferred 45-60 years old, and 11% of patients preferred a provider > 60 years old. Most patients preferred a provider with 5-15 or > 15 years' experience (49% and 46%, respectively). Eleven percent preferred the presence of trainees while 24% preferred trainee absence.

conclusionPatient preferences regarding urogynecologic providers included female gender and provider age 45-60 years old with > 5 years' experience. Further study is needed to identify qualitative components associated with these preferences.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesFemale pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeryGenderMedical learnersPatient preferencesTrainingUrogynecology

Identifiers

PMID31828405
PMCPMC7274874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.