ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020
Assessing patients' preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provider.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Women in spine surgery: can we change the society?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' experiences of discussing sexual function with menopausal women using a vaginal pessary.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- Sex/gender differences in gastrointestinal endoscopy from the perspective of patients and gastroenterologists.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Does the gender of nurses matter to patients? A qualitative analysis of gender preferences of patients.SAGE open medicine · 2023Article
- The positive energy of netizens: development and application of fine-grained sentiment lexicon and emotional intensity model.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Factors influencing patient decision making in Urogynaecology: You are what you know.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisUnderstanding patient preferences regarding provider characteristics is an under-explored area in urogynecology. This study aims to describe patient preferences for urogynecologic care, including provider gender, age, experience, and presence of medical trainees.
methodsThis was a multicenter, cross-sectional, survey-based study assessing patient preferences with a voluntary, self-administered, anonymous questionnaire prior to their first urogynecology consult. A 5-point Likert scale addressing provider gender, age, experience, and presence of trainees was used. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics and provider preferences. Chi-squared (or Fisher's exact) test was used to test for associations.
resultsSix hundred fifteen women participated from eight sites including all geographic regions across the US; 70.8% identified as white with mean age of 58.5 ± 14.2 years. Urinary incontinence was the most commonly reported symptom (45.9%); 51.4% saw a female provider. The majority of patients saw a provider 45-60 years old (42.8%) with > 15 years' experience (60.9%). Sixty-five percent of patients preferred a female provider; 10% preferred a male provider. Sixteen percent preferred a provider < 45 years old, 36% preferred 45-60 years old, and 11% of patients preferred a provider > 60 years old. Most patients preferred a provider with 5-15 or > 15 years' experience (49% and 46%, respectively). Eleven percent preferred the presence of trainees while 24% preferred trainee absence.
conclusionPatient preferences regarding urogynecologic providers included female gender and provider age 45-60 years old with > 5 years' experience. Further study is needed to identify qualitative components associated with these preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.