Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31828394›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2020

4-MeO-PCP and 3-MeO-PCMo, new dissociative drugs, produce rewarding and reinforcing effects through activation of mesolimbic dopamine pathway and alteration of accumbal CREB, deltaFosB, and BDNF levels.

Arvie Abiero, Chrislean Jun Botanas, Raly James Custodio, Leandro Val Sayson, Mikyung Kim, Hyun Jun Lee, Hee Jin Kim, Kun Won Lee, Youngdo Jeong, Joung-Wook Seo and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deletion ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New psychoactive substances: a review and updates.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Arvie AbieroUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarangro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01795, Republic of Korea.
Chrislean Jun BotanasUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarangro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01795, Republic of Korea.
Raly James CustodioUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarangro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01795, Republic of Korea.
Leandro Val SaysonUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarangro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01795, Republic of Korea.
Mikyung KimUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarangro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01795, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Jun LeeUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarangro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01795, Republic of Korea.
Hee Jin KimUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarangro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01795, Republic of Korea.
Kun Won LeeMedicinal Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy & Department of Life and Nanopharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
Youngdo JeongMedicinal Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy & Department of Life and Nanopharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
Joung-Wook SeoCenter for Safety Pharmacology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Daejeon, 305-343, Republic of Korea.
In Soo RyuCenter for Safety Pharmacology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Daejeon, 305-343, Republic of Korea.
Yong Sup LeeMedicinal Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy & Department of Life and Nanopharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea. kyslee@khu.ac.kr.
Jae Hoon CheongUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, College of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarangro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01795, Republic of Korea. cheongjh@syu.ac.kr.
Sahmyook University · KRKyung Hee University · KRKorea Institute of Toxicology · KRJeonbuk National University · KR

Funding

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety 19182MFDS410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleA high number of synthetic dissociative drugs continue to be available through online stores, leading to their misuse. Recent inclusions in this category are 4-MeO-PCP and 3-MeO-PCMo, analogs of phencyclidine. Although the dissociative effects of these drugs and their recreational use have been reported, no studies have investigated their abuse potential.

objectivesTo examine their rewarding and reinforcing effects and explore the mechanistic correlations.

methodsWe used conditioned place preference (CPP), self-administration, and locomotor sensitization tests to assess the rewarding and reinforcing effects of the drugs. We explored their mechanism of action by pretreating dopamine receptor (DR) D1 antagonist SCH23390 and DRD2 antagonist haloperidol during CPP test and investigated the effects of 4-MeO-PCP and 3-MeO-PCMo on dopamine-related proteins in the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens. We also measured the levels of dopamine, phosphorylated cyclic-AMP response element-binding (p-CREB) protein, deltaFosB, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the nucleus accumbens. Additionally, we examined the effects of both drugs on brain wave activity using electroencephalography.

resultsWhile both 4-MeO-PCP and 3-MeO-PCMo induced CPP and self-administration, only 4-MeO-PCP elicited locomotor sensitization. SCH23390 and haloperidol inhibited the acquisition of drug CPP. 4-MeO-PCP and 3-MeO-PCMo altered the levels of tyrosine hydroxylase, DRD1, DRD2, and dopamine, as well as that of p-CREB, deltaFosB, and BDNF. All drugs increased the delta and gamma wave activity, whereas pretreatment with SCH23390 and haloperidol inhibited it.

conclusionOur results indicate that 4-MeO-PCP and 3-MeO-PCMo induce rewarding and reinforcing effects that are probably mediated by the mesolimbic dopamine system, suggesting an abuse liability in humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinDesigner DrugsDopamineIllicit DrugsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMorpholinesNucleus AccumbensPhencyclidineProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReward4-(1-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexyl)morpholineBdnf protein, mouseBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCreb1 protein, mouseCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinDesigner DrugsDopamineFosb protein, mouseIllicit DrugsmethoxydineMorpholinesPhencyclidineProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos3-MeO-PCMo4-MeO-PCPAbuse potentialDopaminergic systemElectroencephalographyReward

Identifiers

PMID31828394
OpenAlexW2994664840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.