Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31828353›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2020

[Modern cognitive behavior therapy of psychotic disorders].

Matthias Pillny, Tania M Lincoln

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthias PillnyKlinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Institut für Psychologie, Fakultät für Psychologie und Bewegungswissenschaft, Universität Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146, Hamburg, Deutschland. matthias.pillny@uni-hamburg.de.
Tania M LincolnKlinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Institut für Psychologie, Fakultät für Psychologie und Bewegungswissenschaft, Universität Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current treatment guidelines recommend several effective psychotherapeutic approaches for different indications or aims in the therapy of patients with psychotic disorders. In particular, cognitive behavior therapy (CBTp) is recommended for the treatment of positive and general symptoms in all phases of the disorder without any restriction. Although CBTp could be easily implemented in routine care, very few of the affected patients have access to this evidence-based procedure in inpatient or outpatient settings. The interventions in CBTp directly address the psychotic symptoms themselves as well as the factors involved in the development and maintenance of symptoms. The core features of CBTp are a normalizing attitude of the therapist towards symptoms, an individualized approach and cognitive interventions. Recent developments include symptom-specific, metacognitive as well as mindfulness and acceptance-based approaches. Moreover, the reduction of comorbid symptoms can add to the benefit of the treatment. This article provides an overview of the basic CBTp techniques and of some of the latest developments in this field. It is hoped that this will contribute to the training of therapists and to the better implementation of evidence-based and guideline-based psychotherapy in the care of patients with psychotic disorders.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychotic DisordersComorbidityHumansInpatientsOutpatientsTreatment OutcomePsychological interventionsPsychosisSchizophreniaTherapyTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.