ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020
Motion Perception in the Common Marmoset.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linking neural population formatting to function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Resting-state functional connectivity of the marmoset claustrum.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Acute Neuropixels Recordings in the Marmoset Monkey.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Acute Neuropixels recordings in the marmoset monkey.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- A dynamic sequence of visual processing initiated by gaze shifts.Nature neuroscience · 2023Article
- Detailed characterization of neural selectivity in free viewing primates.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Fast prediction in marmoset reach-to-grasp movements for dynamic prey.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- Acclimatizing and training freely viewing marmosets for behavioral and electrophysiological experiments in oculomotor tasks.Physiological reports · 2023Article
- Marmosets: a promising model for probing the neural mechanisms underlying complex visual networks such as the frontal-parietal network.Brain structure & function · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Visual motion processing is a well-established model system for studying neural population codes in primates. The common marmoset, a small new world primate, offers unparalleled opportunities to probe these population codes in key motion processing areas, such as cortical areas MT and MST, because these areas are accessible for imaging and recording at the cortical surface. However, little is currently known about the perceptual abilities of the marmoset. Here, we introduce a paradigm for studying motion perception in the marmoset and compare their psychophysical performance with human observers. We trained two marmosets to perform a motion estimation task in which they provided an analog report of their perceived direction of motion with an eye movement to a ring that surrounded the motion stimulus. Marmosets and humans exhibited similar trade-offs in speed versus accuracy: errors were larger and reaction times were longer as the strength of the motion signal was reduced. Reverse correlation on the temporal fluctuations in motion direction revealed that both species exhibited short integration windows; however, marmosets had substantially less nondecision time than humans. Our results provide the first quantification of motion perception in the marmoset and demonstrate several advantages to using analog estimation tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.